Irlenbusch U, Rott O, Gebhardt K, Werner A
Orthopädische Klinik, Marienstift Arnstadt.
Z Orthop Unfall. 2008 Mar-Apr;146(2):211-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-989448.
The displacement of the rotation centre of the humeral head in relation to the axis of the shaft varies strongly between individuals. The Affinis shoulder endoprosthesis has a double excentric adjustment possibility that permits us to adapt the head to the medial and dorsal offset. So far, such examinations have taken place exclusively on anatomic preparations. This raises the question of whether the need for such a prosthetic system can be derived from the anatomic variation of the pivot points.
In 49 patients with an implanted Affinis shoulder prostheses, we calculated the individual rotation centres of the head from the position of the relocatable prosthetic cone and the excentric position of the head. In addition, we used the Constant score to record the clinical function.
In the examined case material, we needed the entire setting range of 12 mm mediolateral and 6 mm dorsoventral of the prosthesis, as it presented a great variation of the rotational centres of the head. The majority of the head centres were displaced in a posterior-lateral direction. The examination showed that none of the found anatomic head centres could have been reconstructed exactly with a conventional prosthesis. Prostheses with a single excentricity would allow correct adjustment in only 9 cases, as the adjustable rotational centres of the head are situated in an orbit, which limits the setting possibilities. In 20 of the 49 patients humeral head prosthesis were implanted in cases of primary osteoarthritis. The Constant score of this group improved from 18 points preoperatively to 76 points after 24.1 months in the mean.
The high variation of the head centres indicates the necessity of a freely adjustable system, such as in a double excentric bearing. This is a way that permits an optimal reconstruction of the anatomic conditions. Therefore all technical chances for bony balancing should be used to adapt the prosthesis to the bone and not the bone to the prosthesis.
肱骨头旋转中心相对于肱骨干轴线的位移在个体之间差异很大。Affinis 肩关节假体具有双重偏心调节功能,使我们能够使假体头部适应内侧和背侧偏移。到目前为止,此类检查仅在解剖标本上进行。这就提出了一个问题,即这种假体系统的需求是否可以从枢轴点的解剖变异中推导出来。
在 49 例植入 Affinis 肩关节假体的患者中,我们根据可重新定位的假体锥的位置和头部的偏心位置计算了个体的头部旋转中心。此外,我们使用 Constant 评分来记录临床功能。
在所检查的病例材料中,我们需要假体 12 毫米内外侧和 6 毫米背腹侧的整个调节范围,因为头部旋转中心存在很大差异。大多数头部中心向后外侧移位。检查表明,使用传统假体无法精确重建所发现的任何解剖学头部中心。单偏心假体仅在 9 例中能实现正确调节,因为头部的可调节旋转中心位于一个轨道内,这限制了调节可能性。49 例患者中有 20 例在原发性骨关节炎病例中植入了肱骨头假体。该组的 Constant 评分从术前的 18 分平均在 24.1 个月后提高到 76 分。
头部中心的高度变异表明需要一个可自由调节的系统,如双偏心轴承。这是一种允许最佳重建解剖条件的方法。因此,应利用所有骨平衡的技术机会使假体适应骨骼,而不是使骨骼适应假体。