Loveman E, Frampton G K, Clegg A J
Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development, University of Southampton, UK.
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Apr;12(9):1-116, iii. doi: 10.3310/hta12090.
To examine the clinical effectiveness of patient education models for adults with Type 2 diabetes.
Electronic databases were searched from 2002 to January 2007.
A systematic review of the literature on educational interventions in diabetes was undertaken. This was an update of a previous systematic review.
Including studies identified in the previous systematic review, there were 13 published studies. Eight studies of education on multiple aspects of diabetes self-management were identified that provided education that was focused on a particular aspect of self-management. The quality of reporting and methodology of the studies was variable. Studies of multi-component educational interventions yielded mixed results. Some trials reported significant improvements on measures of diabetic control but others did not. Positive effects may be attributable to longer-term interventions with a shorter duration between the end of the intervention and the follow-up evaluation point. There may also be an effect of having a multi-professional team delivering the educational programme. Studies of focused educational interventions did not yield consistent results. Some effects were shown on measures of diabetic control in studies that focused on diet or exercise alone. Although the effects shown were generally small, those that were present did appear to be relatively long-lasting. This update review does not substantially alter the conclusions of the previous systematic review; for each outcome, the proportion of studies that demonstrated significant effects of education was similar.
Based on the evidence, it would seem that education delivered by a team of educators, with some degree of reinforcement of that education made at additional points of contact, may provide the best opportunity for improvements in patient outcomes. Educators need to have time and resources to fulfil the needs of any structured educational programme. There is also a need for education to have a clear programme at the outset. From the evidence reported it is unclear what resources would need to be directed at the educators themselves to ensure that they can deliver programmes successfully. Any future research should consider patient education within the context of overall diabetes care and as such follow guidelines for the development and evaluation of complex interventions. Good-quality, longer-term studies would be desirable, but these would require careful consideration around the nature of any control group. Information is needed to clarify the sensitivity of diabetes education programmes to the performance of the diabetes educators, in order to ensure success and cost-effectiveness of education programmes.
探讨针对成年2型糖尿病患者的患者教育模式的临床效果。
检索了2002年至2007年1月的电子数据库。
对糖尿病教育干预的文献进行了系统综述。这是对先前系统综述的更新。
包括先前系统综述中确定的研究在内,共有13项已发表的研究。确定了8项关于糖尿病自我管理多个方面教育的研究,这些研究提供的教育侧重于自我管理的特定方面。研究的报告质量和方法各不相同。多成分教育干预的研究结果不一。一些试验报告在糖尿病控制指标上有显著改善,但其他试验则没有。积极效果可能归因于长期干预,干预结束与随访评估点之间的持续时间较短。由多专业团队提供教育计划可能也有效果。针对性教育干预的研究结果并不一致。仅关注饮食或运动的研究在糖尿病控制指标上显示出一些效果。虽然显示的效果通常较小,但确实出现的效果似乎相对持久。本次更新综述并未实质性改变先前系统综述的结论;对于每个结果,显示教育有显著效果的研究比例相似。
基于现有证据,由一组教育工作者提供教育,并在其他接触点对该教育进行一定程度的强化,似乎可能为改善患者结局提供最佳机会。教育工作者需要有时间和资源来满足任何结构化教育计划的需求。教育从一开始也需要有明确的计划。从报告的证据来看,尚不清楚需要向教育工作者自身投入哪些资源,以确保他们能够成功实施计划。未来的任何研究都应在整体糖尿病护理的背景下考虑患者教育,并遵循复杂干预措施开发和评估的指南。高质量、长期的研究是可取的,但这需要围绕任何对照组的性质进行仔细考虑。需要信息来阐明糖尿病教育计划对糖尿病教育工作者表现的敏感性,以确保教育计划的成功和成本效益。