Loder Randall T
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana School of Medicine, Indiana University, IN 46202, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Apr;43(4):691-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.061.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: There have been many different studies of injuries owing to playground equipment but none that have looked in detail using large nationwide databases. It was the purpose of this study to investigate injuries owing to playground equipment using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database and further understand their demographics.
Detailed NEISS injury data from 2002 through 2004 for slides, monkey bars, and swings were analyzed. Appropriate statistical analyses were performed; because of the many analyses on this large data set, P < .01 was considered statistically significant.
There were 22728 emergency department visits owing to playground equipment injuries recorded by NEISS between 2002 and 2004; 83.9% were owing to monkey bars, swings, and slides, and the 5 most common diagnoses were fractures (39.3%), contusions/abrasions (20.6%), lacerations (16.6%), strains/sprains (9.9%), and traumatic brain injuries (TBI) (8.5%). There were 9487 boys (54.3%) and 7995 girls (45.7%). The average age was 6.5 +/- 3.0 years. The injuries occurred at school in 38.9%; at a recreation/sporting facility, in 35.5%; and at home, in 25.6%. Most were treated and released (94.4%). Amerindian children were 2 times more likely than blacks to be admitted; compared to contusions, fractures were 9.8 times, and TBIs, 4.7 times more likely to be admitted. Injuries on monkey bars were 1.2 times more likely to be admitted than those on swings or slides. Fractures were 1.9 times more likely to occur on a monkey bar compared with swings or slides. Traumatic brain injuries were 1.4 times more likely to occur on a swing compared to slides or monkey bars.
Swings at school are the most common mechanism of injury for TBIs, and the seasonal data would suggest that increased supervision of children using swings during school hours might reduce the occurrence of TBIs. Monkey bars are the most common cause of fracture, and fracture is the most common cause of admission. Prevention strategies to reduce the number of fractures should be directed at monkey bar equipment and landing surfaces. The trend in playground equipment injury also indicates that monkey bars are problematic because the number of injuries per year per capita owing to monkey bars is stable, whereas those from swings and slides is decreasing.
背景/目的:针对游乐场设施导致的伤害已有许多不同研究,但尚无一项研究利用全国性大型数据库进行详细调查。本研究旨在利用国家电子伤害监测系统(NEISS)数据库调查游乐场设施导致的伤害,并进一步了解其人口统计学特征。
分析了2002年至2004年NEISS中有关滑梯、单杠和秋千的详细伤害数据。进行了适当的统计分析;由于对这个大数据集进行了多次分析,P <.01被认为具有统计学意义。
2002年至2004年期间,NEISS记录了22728起因游乐场设施伤害而前往急诊科就诊的案例;其中83.9%是由单杠、秋千和滑梯导致的,最常见的5种诊断为骨折(39.3%)、挫伤/擦伤(20.6%)、撕裂伤(16.6%)、拉伤/扭伤(9.9%)和创伤性脑损伤(TBI)(8.5%)。有9487名男孩(54.3%)和7995名女孩(45.7%)。平均年龄为6.5±3.0岁。伤害发生在学校的占38.9%;在娱乐/体育设施的占35.5%;在家中的占25.6%。大多数人接受治疗后出院(94.4%)。美洲印第安儿童入院的可能性是黑人儿童的2倍;与挫伤相比,骨折入院的可能性高9.8倍,TBI入院的可能性高4.7倍。在单杠上受伤入院的可能性比在秋千或滑梯上受伤高1.2倍。与秋千或滑梯相比,在单杠上发生骨折的可能性高1.9倍。与滑梯或单杠相比,在秋千上发生创伤性脑损伤的可能性高1.4倍。
学校里的秋千是TBI最常见的致伤机制,季节性数据表明,在上课时间加强对使用秋千儿童的监管可能会减少TBI的发生。单杠是骨折最常见的原因,而骨折是入院最常见的原因。减少骨折数量的预防策略应针对单杠设施和着陆面。游乐场设施伤害的趋势还表明,单杠存在问题,因为每年人均因单杠导致的伤害数量稳定,而秋千和滑梯导致的伤害数量在减少。