Arthroscopic versus open dorsal ganglion excision: a prospective, randomized comparison of rates of recurrence and of residual pain.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative rates of ganglion recurrence between arthroscopic and open techniques of dorsal ganglion (DG) excision.

METHODS

A total of 72 patients had either arthroscopic or open excision of a primary, simple DG by 1 of 2 senior hand surgeons. Three prospective postoperative assessments were performed. The first examination was performed at 5 to 7 days, the second at 4 to 8 weeks, and the third assessment was performed at a minimum of 1 year after surgery. Percentages of ganglion recurrence at the second and third assessments were recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients had arthroscopic excision, and 31 patients had open excision. Baseline patient age, gender, and surgical side were similar between the 2 groups. Recurrence of the DG at the second postoperative assessment was 1 of 41 patients in the arthroscopic group and none in the open excision group, and, after a minimum of 12 months after excision, recurrence was 3 of 28 in the arthroscopic group and 2 of 23 in the open group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study compares the rates of ganglion recurrence between arthroscopic and open DG excision. Our results demonstrate that at 12 months follow-up, the rates of recurrence with arthroscopic DG excision are comparable with and not superior to those of open excision. Our results suggest that additional long-term comparative studies are needed to accurately differentiate the efficacy of open and arthroscopic techniques.