Suppr超能文献

两种儿科复苏与重症监护管理方法的比较

Comparison of two methods of pediatric resuscitation and critical care management.

作者信息

Fineberg Steven Lee, Arendts Glenn

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, The St. George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jul;52(1):35-40.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.10.021. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We compare time to drug delivery and the incidence of dosage error between 2 different systems of medication administration: The Broselow Pediatric Emergency Tape and a standardized volume/weight-based dose reformulation of resuscitation and critical care medications (reformulated to 0.1 mL/kg).

METHODS

This was a randomized crossover trial, in which volunteers (n=16) from emergency department (ED) pediatric resuscitation teams from the ED of a large, urban, teaching hospital in Australia were assigned to manage simulated (Advanced Pediatric Life Support scenario) patients. The volunteers were each presented with 3 case scenarios (brady-asystolic arrest, status epilepticus, and rapid sequence intubation requiring administration of 4, 5, and 4 medications, respectively). The order of presentation was randomized for the 2 methods. The volunteers were then asked to manage 3 case scenarios using one and then the other method (resulting in a total of 6 cases managed per participant). The dosage of each medication ordered, as well as the time to the simulated administration of that medication, was recorded for all scenarios. The expected dosages were compared with the actual dosages delivered to determine which system provided greater accuracy in medication administration. Statistical analysis was undertaken using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemars test for paired proportions.

RESULTS

Compared with the Broselow tape, the standardized volume/weight-based dose reformulation significantly reduced median time to medication delivery for all clinical scenarios (147 versus 72 seconds; 197 versus 87 seconds; 146 versus 64 seconds; P<.001). The proportion of dosing errors with Broselow tape across the 3 scenarios was greater than with volume/weight-based dosing (0.08 versus 0, 0 versus 0, and 0.08 versus 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Use of a standardized volume/weight-based dose reformulation method is a simple, fast, and accurate method of medication delivery for the pediatric patient that eliminates the need for memorization and/or calculation. The standardized volume/weight-based dose reformulation method performs better than the Broselow tape in speed of delivery of medications used for pediatric resuscitation and critical care without any reduction in dosing accuracy.

摘要

研究目的

我们比较了两种不同药物给药系统之间的给药时间和剂量错误发生率,这两种系统分别是:布罗泽洛小儿急救胶带和基于标准化体积/体重的复苏及重症监护药物剂量重新配方(重新配方为0.1 mL/kg)。

方法

这是一项随机交叉试验,来自澳大利亚一家大型城市教学医院急诊科小儿复苏团队的志愿者(n = 16)被分配管理模拟(高级小儿生命支持场景)患者。志愿者们每人会面对3种病例场景(心搏徐缓 - 心搏停止、癫痫持续状态以及快速顺序插管,分别需要使用4种、5种和4种药物)。两种方法的呈现顺序是随机的。然后要求志愿者先用一种方法,再用另一种方法管理3种病例场景(每位参与者总共管理6个病例)。记录所有场景下每种医嘱药物的剂量以及模拟给药时间。将预期剂量与实际给药剂量进行比较,以确定哪种系统在药物给药方面提供更高的准确性。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和McNemars配对比例检验进行统计分析。

结果

与布罗泽洛胶带相比,基于标准化体积/体重的剂量重新配方显著缩短了所有临床场景下的给药中位时间(分别为147秒对72秒;197秒对87秒;146秒对64秒;P <.001)。在这3种场景中,使用布罗泽洛胶带的剂量错误比例高于基于体积/体重的给药方式(分别为0.08对0、0对0以及0.08对0.02)。

结论

使用基于标准化体积/体重的剂量重新配方方法是一种简单、快速且准确的小儿患者给药方法,无需记忆和/或计算。在小儿复苏和重症监护所用药物的给药速度方面,基于标准化体积/体重的剂量重新配方方法比布罗泽洛胶带表现更好,且给药准确性没有降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验