Suppr超能文献

基于跨理论模型的初级保健饮食干预:糖尿病证据综述

Transtheoretical model-based dietary interventions in primary care: a review of the evidence in diabetes.

作者信息

Salmela Sanna, Poskiparta Marita, Kasila Kirsti, Vähäsarja Kati, Vanhala Mauno

机构信息

Research Centre for Health Promotion, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, PO Box 35 (L), FIN-40014, Finland.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2009 Apr;24(2):237-52. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn015. Epub 2008 Apr 11.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to review the evidence concerning stage-based dietary interventions in primary care among persons with diabetes or an elevated diabetes risk. Search strategies were electronic databases and manual search. Selection criteria were randomized controlled studies with stage-based dietary intervention, conducted in primary care with at least 6 months of follow-up, and participants with either type 2 diabetes or with an elevated risk. The researchers evaluated trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed study quality. Seven articles, based on five data sets, were included. These studies concentrated on cardiovascular diseases and being overweight, not diabetes. The quality of the studies was moderate to weak. Inadequacies in the reporting often involved unspecific information on the training of health care providers. Long-term positive outcomes (compared with controls) were found in total and monounsaturated fat intake, diastolic blood pressure, health status and well-being. The existing data are insufficient for drawing conclusions on the benefits of the transtheoretical model. More high-quality studies focusing on diabetes are needed, with greater attention to the training of providers and process evaluation. There is a need for a standardized appraisal tool for study evaluation, focusing separately on education interventions for patients and providers.

摘要

本研究的目的是回顾有关糖尿病患者或糖尿病风险升高者在初级保健中基于阶段的饮食干预的证据。检索策略为电子数据库检索和手工检索。纳入标准为在初级保健中进行的、至少随访6个月的、采用基于阶段的饮食干预的随机对照研究,以及患有2型糖尿病或风险升高的参与者。研究人员评估试验是否纳入、提取数据并评估研究质量。纳入了基于五个数据集的七篇文章。这些研究集中在心血管疾病和超重方面,而非糖尿病。研究质量为中等至较差。报告中的不足之处通常涉及关于医疗保健提供者培训的不具体信息。在总脂肪和单不饱和脂肪摄入量、舒张压、健康状况和幸福感方面发现了长期积极结果(与对照组相比)。现有数据不足以就跨理论模型的益处得出结论。需要更多关注糖尿病的高质量研究,更加注重提供者的培训和过程评估。需要一种标准化的研究评估工具,分别关注针对患者和提供者的教育干预。

相似文献

1
Transtheoretical model-based dietary interventions in primary care: a review of the evidence in diabetes.
Health Educ Res. 2009 Apr;24(2):237-52. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn015. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
3
4
6
Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
7
Community-based care for the management of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(23):1-40. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
9
10

引用本文的文献

1
CUBES: A practical toolkit to measure enablers and barriers to behavior for effective intervention design.
Gates Open Res. 2019 Mar 18;3:886. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.12923.2. eCollection 2019.
2
Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavioral Change: A Systematic Review.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019 Mar-Apr;24(2):83-90. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_94_17.
4
Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption: Methodological protocol of a randomized controlled community trial.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Apr 5;10:131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.04.003. eCollection 2018 Jun.
5
Results of a pilot study of patient-to-patient education strategy on self-management among glycemic uncontrolled patients with diabetes.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Apr 13;11:787-793. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S130060. eCollection 2017.
8
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in low- and middle-income countries.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 4;2015(8):CD011163. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011163.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Time for a change: putting the Transtheoretical (Stages of Change) Model to rest.
Addiction. 2005 Aug;100(8):1036-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01139.x.
5
Stage-matched nutrition guidance: stages of change and fat consumption in Dutch patients at elevated cardiovascular risk.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004 Sep-Oct;36(5):228-37. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60385-0.
7
A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 Sep 16;4:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-22.
8
Effects of a tailored lifestyle self-management intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Br J Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;9(Pt 3):365-79. doi: 10.1348/1359107041557066.
9
Why don't stage-based activity promotion interventions work?
Health Educ Res. 2005 Apr;20(2):237-43. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg105. Epub 2004 Jul 14.
10
Stage-based lifestyle interventions in primary care: are they effective?
Am J Prev Med. 2004 May;26(4):330-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.12.010.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验