Salmela Sanna, Poskiparta Marita, Kasila Kirsti, Vähäsarja Kati, Vanhala Mauno
Research Centre for Health Promotion, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, PO Box 35 (L), FIN-40014, Finland.
Health Educ Res. 2009 Apr;24(2):237-52. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn015. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
The objective of this study was to review the evidence concerning stage-based dietary interventions in primary care among persons with diabetes or an elevated diabetes risk. Search strategies were electronic databases and manual search. Selection criteria were randomized controlled studies with stage-based dietary intervention, conducted in primary care with at least 6 months of follow-up, and participants with either type 2 diabetes or with an elevated risk. The researchers evaluated trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed study quality. Seven articles, based on five data sets, were included. These studies concentrated on cardiovascular diseases and being overweight, not diabetes. The quality of the studies was moderate to weak. Inadequacies in the reporting often involved unspecific information on the training of health care providers. Long-term positive outcomes (compared with controls) were found in total and monounsaturated fat intake, diastolic blood pressure, health status and well-being. The existing data are insufficient for drawing conclusions on the benefits of the transtheoretical model. More high-quality studies focusing on diabetes are needed, with greater attention to the training of providers and process evaluation. There is a need for a standardized appraisal tool for study evaluation, focusing separately on education interventions for patients and providers.
本研究的目的是回顾有关糖尿病患者或糖尿病风险升高者在初级保健中基于阶段的饮食干预的证据。检索策略为电子数据库检索和手工检索。纳入标准为在初级保健中进行的、至少随访6个月的、采用基于阶段的饮食干预的随机对照研究,以及患有2型糖尿病或风险升高的参与者。研究人员评估试验是否纳入、提取数据并评估研究质量。纳入了基于五个数据集的七篇文章。这些研究集中在心血管疾病和超重方面,而非糖尿病。研究质量为中等至较差。报告中的不足之处通常涉及关于医疗保健提供者培训的不具体信息。在总脂肪和单不饱和脂肪摄入量、舒张压、健康状况和幸福感方面发现了长期积极结果(与对照组相比)。现有数据不足以就跨理论模型的益处得出结论。需要更多关注糖尿病的高质量研究,更加注重提供者的培训和过程评估。需要一种标准化的研究评估工具,分别关注针对患者和提供者的教育干预。