• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CUBES:一个用于衡量行为促成因素和障碍以进行有效干预设计的实用工具包。

CUBES: A practical toolkit to measure enablers and barriers to behavior for effective intervention design.

作者信息

Engl Elisabeth, Sgaier Sema K

机构信息

Surgo Foundation, Washington, District of Columbia, 20001, USA.

Department of Global Health & Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Gates Open Res. 2019 Mar 18;3:886. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.12923.2. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.12688/gatesopenres.12923.2
PMID:31294419
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6601426/
Abstract

A pressing goal in global development and other sectors is often to understand what drives people's behaviors, and how to influence them. Yet designing behavior change interventions is often an unsystematic process, hobbled by insufficient understanding of contextual and perceptual behavioral drivers and a narrow focus on limited research methods to assess them. We propose a toolkit (CUBES) of two solutions to help programs arrive at more effective interventions. First, we introduce a novel framework of behavior, which is a practical tool for programs to structure potential drivers and match corresponding interventions. This evidence-based framework was developed through extensive cross-sectoral literature research and refined through application in large-scale global development programs. Second, we propose a set of descriptive, experimental, and simulation approaches that can enhance and expand the methods commonly used in global development. Since not all methods are equally suited to capture the different types of drivers of behavior, we present a decision aid for method selection. We recommend that existing commonly used methods, such as observations and surveys, use CUBES as a scaffold and incorporate validated measures of specific types of drivers in order to comprehensively test all the potential components of a target behavior. We also recommend under-used methods from sectors such as market research, experimental psychology, and decision science, which programs can use to extend their toolkit and test the importance and impact of key enablers and barriers. The CUBES toolkit enables programs across sectors to streamline the process of conceptualizing, designing, and optimizing interventions, and ultimately to change behaviors and achieve targeted outcomes.

摘要

全球发展及其他领域的一个紧迫目标通常是了解驱动人们行为的因素以及如何对其施加影响。然而,设计行为改变干预措施往往是一个缺乏系统性的过程,因对情境和感知行为驱动因素的理解不足以及过于局限于评估这些因素的有限研究方法而受到阻碍。我们提出了一个包含两种解决方案的工具包(CUBES),以帮助各项目制定更有效的干预措施。首先,我们引入了一个新颖的行为框架,这是一个实用工具,可帮助各项目梳理潜在驱动因素并匹配相应的干预措施。这个基于证据的框架是通过广泛的跨部门文献研究开发出来的,并在大规模全球发展项目的应用中得到完善。其次,我们提出了一套描述性、实验性和模拟性方法,这些方法可以改进和扩展全球发展中常用的方法。由于并非所有方法都同样适合捕捉不同类型的行为驱动因素,我们提供了一个方法选择决策辅助工具。我们建议,现有的常用方法,如观察法和调查法,以CUBES为框架,并纳入特定类型驱动因素的经过验证的测量方法,以便全面测试目标行为的所有潜在组成部分。我们还推荐市场研究、实验心理学和决策科学等领域较少使用的方法,各项目可以用这些方法来扩充其工具包,并测试关键促成因素和障碍的重要性及影响。CUBES工具包使各领域的项目能够简化干预措施的概念化、设计和优化过程,并最终改变行为,实现预期成果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93b/6944812/c91c08f13715/gatesopenres-3-14261-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93b/6944812/df991ebaced9/gatesopenres-3-14261-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93b/6944812/c91c08f13715/gatesopenres-3-14261-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93b/6944812/df991ebaced9/gatesopenres-3-14261-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93b/6944812/c91c08f13715/gatesopenres-3-14261-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
CUBES: A practical toolkit to measure enablers and barriers to behavior for effective intervention design.CUBES:一个用于衡量行为促成因素和障碍以进行有效干预设计的实用工具包。
Gates Open Res. 2019 Mar 18;3:886. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.12923.2. eCollection 2019.
2
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
3
Nonsomatic treatment of depression.抑郁症的非躯体治疗。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2002 Jul;11(3):579-93. doi: 10.1016/s1056-4993(02)00009-3.
4
Developing a toolkit to implement the Statin Choice Conversation Aid at scale: application of a work reduction model.开发一个大规模实施他汀类药物选择交流辅助工具的工具包:工作简化模型的应用
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 24;19(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4055-8.
5
Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour.行为、行为者、环境、目标、时间(AACTT):一个用于指定行为的框架。
Implement Sci. 2019 Dec 5;14(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0951-x.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
A multidimensional approach to assessing intervention fidelity in a process evaluation of audit and feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions: a study protocol.在一项旨在减少不必要输血的审核与反馈干预措施的过程评估中,采用多维方法评估干预保真度:一项研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2016 Dec 12;11(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0528-x.
8
Tuberculosis结核病
9
Development of a theory-informed implementation intervention to improve the triage, treatment and transfer of stroke patients in emergency departments using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): the T Trial.运用理论领域框架(TDF)制定一个理论导向的实施干预措施,以改善急诊科中风患者的分诊、治疗和转院:T 试验。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jul 17;12(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0616-6.
10
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.

引用本文的文献

1
How do psychobehavioural variables shed light on heterogeneity in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance? Evidence from United States general population surveys on a probability panel and social media.心理行为变量如何揭示 COVID-19 疫苗接种接受度的异质性?来自美国概率面板和社交媒体一般人群调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 6;13(6):e066897. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066897.
2
Discovery of interconnected causal drivers of COVID-19 vaccination intentions in the US using a causal Bayesian network.利用因果贝叶斯网络发现美国 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿的互联因果驱动因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 16;13(1):6988. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33745-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying population segments for effective intervention design and targeting using unsupervised machine learning: an end-to-end guide.使用无监督机器学习识别有效干预设计和目标定位的人群细分:端到端指南。
Gates Open Res. 2019 Oct 21;3:1503. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13029.2. eCollection 2019.
2
What do community health workers want? Findings of a discrete choice experiment among Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) in India.社区卫生工作者想要什么?印度认证社会健康活动家(ASHAs)离散选择实验的结果。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 May 31;4(3):e001509. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001509. eCollection 2019.
3
Use of Deep Learning to Examine the Association of the Built Environment With Prevalence of Neighborhood Adult Obesity.
Women's contraceptive profiles in Burundi: Knowledge, attitudes, and interactions with media and health services.
布隆迪女性避孕方式概况:知识、态度以及与媒体和卫生服务的互动。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 27;17(7):e0271944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271944. eCollection 2022.
4
Implementation practice models for development in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review of peer-reviewed literature.中低收入国家发展的实施实践模式:同行评议文献的系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;22(1):1157. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13530-0.
5
Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 10. Programme performance and its assessment.新时代的社区卫生工作者:10. 方案绩效及其评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Oct 12;19(Suppl 3):108. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00758-2.
6
Understanding drivers of family planning in rural northern India: An integrated mixed-methods approach.了解印度北部农村地区计划生育的驱动因素:一种综合的混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 13;16(1):e0243854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243854. eCollection 2021.
7
Closing the gap on institutional delivery in northern India: a case study of how integrated machine learning approaches can enable precision public health.缩小印度北部机构分娩差距:综合机器学习方法如何能够实现精准公共卫生的案例研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002340.
8
Bringing Greater Precision to Interactions Between Community Health Workers and Households to Improve Maternal and Newborn Health Outcomes in India.提高社区卫生工作者与家庭之间互动的精准度,改善印度母婴健康结局。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Sep 30;8(3):358-371. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00027.
9
Understanding why at-risk population segments do not seek care for tuberculosis: a precision public health approach in South India.了解为何高危人群不寻求结核病治疗:印度南部的精准公共卫生方法。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002555.
利用深度学习研究建筑环境与社区成年人肥胖患病率之间的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181535. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1535.
4
Evaluating the effectiveness of behavior change techniques in health-related behavior: a scoping review of methods used.评估行为改变技术在健康相关行为中的有效性:方法的综述评价。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Mar 1;8(2):212-224. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx019.
5
How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.离散选择实验在多大程度上能够预测健康选择?系统评价和元分析的外部有效性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Nov;19(8):1053-1066. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0954-6. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
6
Outcomes of a Coaching-Based WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program in India.印度一项基于指导的世界卫生组织安全分娩检查表项目的成果。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 14;377(24):2313-2324. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701075.
7
A case study for a psychographic-behavioral segmentation approach for targeted demand generation in voluntary medical male circumcision.自愿男性包皮环切术目标需求产生的心理-行为细分方法案例研究。
Elife. 2017 Sep 13;6:e25923. doi: 10.7554/eLife.25923.
8
Divergent Preferences for HIV Prevention: A Discrete Choice Experiment for Multipurpose HIV Prevention Products in South Africa.对 HIV 预防措施的不同偏好:南非多用途 HIV 预防产品的离散选择实验。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Jan;38(1):120-133. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17729376. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
9
Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints.网络科学在逻辑约束下的信仰系统动力学。
Science. 2016 Oct 21;354(6310):321-326. doi: 10.1126/science.aag2624.
10
Interventions to Drive Uptake of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision-A Collection of Impact Evaluation Evidence.推动男性自愿包皮环切术采用率提升的干预措施——影响评估证据汇总
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Oct 1;72 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S257-S261. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001155.