Foletto Mirto, Bernante Paolo, Busetto Luca, Pomerri Fabio, Vecchiato Gianluca, Prevedello Luca, Famengo Stefania, Nitti Donato
Clinica Chirurgica II, Padua University, Via Giustiniani 2, Padua, Italy.
Obes Surg. 2008 Sep;18(9):1099-103. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9458-2. Epub 2008 Apr 12.
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) slippage with pouch dilation is one the most serious long-term complications and requires reoperation in most cases. It is still controversial whether banding should be offered again or a different procedure should be chosen. We report the results of synchronous de-rebanding on a prospective series of patients treated at our institution for slippage with pouch dilation.
From January 2000 to May 2007, 29 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic de-rebanding for slippage with pouch dilation. The mean age at primary operation was 38.9 +/- 8.2 years and the mean BMI was 46.4 +/- 8 kg/m(2). Twenty-eight had previous LAGB, while one had previous open gastric banding, the perigastric technique being used at that time. All the redo procedures were successfully carried out under laparoscopy, via the pars flaccida technique, and all the patients were followed-up according to the usual schedule.
The mean time from the original LAGB was 45.3 +/- 30.3 months, and the mean follow-up after rebanding was 26.9 +/- 20.6 months. At rebanding, the mean BMI was 34.3 +/- 7.6, percent excess weight loss (%EWL) 54.5 +/- 31, and percent excess BMI loss (%EBL) 58.3 +/- 33, respectively. After 1 year, BMI was 36.3 +/- 7.9, %EWL 40.8 +/- 30.5, and %EBL 43.9 +/- 32.7, respectively. After 2 years, BMI was 37.13 +/- 7.4, %EWL 36.9 +/- 29.4, and %EBL 39.6 +/- 31.6, respectively, and after 3 years, BMI was 33.5 +/- 5.6, %EWL 51.9 +/- 24.3, and %EBL 55.7 +/- 25.7, respectively. One patient had re-rebanding after 6 months for a new slippage, two had band removal with refusal to switch to another procedure, one had biliopancreatic diversion for slippage recurrence, and one underwent sleeve gastrectomy for insufficient weight loss after 6 months.
Although this is a limited series, our results show that good outcomes can be expected after rebanding in properly assessed patients with slippage and pouch dilation. Larger series and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.
腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB)伴胃囊扩张的滑脱是最严重的长期并发症之一,多数情况下需要再次手术。对于是否应再次进行束带术或选择其他手术方式仍存在争议。我们报告了对在我院接受治疗的一系列因胃囊扩张伴滑脱而行同步松解束带术患者的前瞻性研究结果。
从2000年1月至2007年5月,29例连续患者因胃囊扩张伴滑脱接受了腹腔镜下松解束带术。初次手术时的平均年龄为38.9±8.2岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为46.4±8kg/m²。28例曾接受过LAGB,1例曾接受过开放式胃束带术,当时采用的是胃周技术。所有再次手术均通过腹腔镜经松弛部技术成功完成,所有患者均按常规进行随访。
距初次LAGB的平均时间为45.3±30.3个月,再次束带术后的平均随访时间为26.9±20.6个月。再次束带时,平均BMI为34.3±7.6,超重体重减轻百分比(%EWL)为54.5±31,超重BMI减轻百分比(%EBL)为58.3±33。1年后,BMI分别为36.3±7.9,%EWL为40.8±30.5,%EBL为43.9±32.7。2年后,BMI分别为37.13±7.4,%EWL为36.9±29.4,%EBL为39.6±31.6,3年后,BMI分别为33.5±5.6,%EWL为51.9±24.3,%EBL为55.7±25.7。1例患者在6个月后因新的滑脱再次进行束带术,2例患者拒绝更换为其他手术方式而移除束带,1例患者因滑脱复发接受了胆胰转流术,1例患者在6个月后因体重减轻不足而接受了袖状胃切除术。
尽管这是一个有限的系列研究,但我们的结果表明,对于经过适当评估的胃囊扩张伴滑脱患者,再次束带术后可预期获得良好的效果。需要更大规模的系列研究和更长时间的随访来证实这些发现。