• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项大型前列腺癌筛查随机试验中直肠指检的观察者间变异性。

The interobserver variability of digital rectal examination in a large randomized trial for the screening of prostate cancer.

作者信息

Gosselaar C, Kranse R, Roobol M J, Roemeling S, Schröder F H

机构信息

Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Prostate. 2008 Jun 15;68(9):985-93. doi: 10.1002/pros.20759.

DOI:10.1002/pros.20759
PMID:18409186
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To analyze to what extent the percentage of suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) findings vary between examiners and to what extent the percentage of prostate cancers (PCs) detected in men with these suspicious findings varies between examiners.

METHODS

In the first screening round of the European Randomized study of Screening for PC (ERSPC) Rotterdam, 7,280 men underwent a PSA-determination and DRE of whom 2,102 underwent prostate biopsy (biopsy indication PSA > or = 4.0 ng/ml and/or suspicious DRE and/or TRUS). Descriptive statistics of DRE-outcome per PSA-range were used to determine the observer variability of six examiners. Because this analysis did not correct properly for other predictors of a suspicious DRE (PSA-level, biopsy indication, TRUS-outcome, prostate volume and age), a logistic regression analysis controlling for these explanatory variables was performed as well.

RESULTS

In 2,102 men biopsied, 443 PCs were detected (PPV = 21%). For all PSA levels the percentage suspicious DRE varied between examiners from 4% to 28% and percentage PC detected in men with a suspicious DRE varied from 18% to 36%. Logistic regression analysis showed that three of six examiners considered DRE significantly more often abnormal than others (ORs 3.48, 2.80, 2.47, P < 0.001). For all examiners the odds to have PC was statistically significantly higher in case of a suspicious DRE (ORs 2.21-5.96, P < 0.05). This increased chance to find PC was not significantly observer-dependent.

CONCLUSIONS

Three of six examiners considered DRE significantly more often suspicious than the others. However, under equal circumstances a suspicious DRE executed by each examiner increased the chance of the presence of PC similarly.

摘要

背景

分析直肠指检(DRE)可疑结果的百分比在检查者之间的差异程度,以及在有这些可疑结果的男性中检测出前列腺癌(PC)的百分比在检查者之间的差异程度。

方法

在欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)鹿特丹的第一轮筛查中,7280名男性接受了前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测和直肠指检,其中2102名男性接受了前列腺活检(活检指征为PSA≥4.0 ng/ml和/或直肠指检可疑和/或经直肠超声检查[TRUS])。采用每个PSA范围的直肠指检结果的描述性统计来确定六位检查者的观察者变异性。由于该分析未对直肠指检可疑的其他预测因素(PSA水平、活检指征、经直肠超声检查结果、前列腺体积和年龄)进行适当校正,因此还进行了控制这些解释变量的逻辑回归分析。

结果

在2102名接受活检的男性中,检测出443例前列腺癌(阳性预测值=21%)。对于所有PSA水平,直肠指检可疑的百分比在检查者之间为4%至28%,在直肠指检可疑的男性中检测出前列腺癌的百分比为18%至36%。逻辑回归分析显示,六位检查者中有三位认为直肠指检异常的频率明显高于其他检查者(比值比分别为3.48、2.80、2.47,P<0.001)。对于所有检查者,直肠指检可疑时患前列腺癌的几率在统计学上显著更高(比值比为2.21 - 5.96,P<0.05)。这种发现前列腺癌几率的增加与观察者无显著相关性。

结论

六位检查者中有三位认为直肠指检可疑的频率明显高于其他检查者。然而,在相同情况下,每位检查者进行的可疑直肠指检增加存在前列腺癌的几率类似。

相似文献

1
The interobserver variability of digital rectal examination in a large randomized trial for the screening of prostate cancer.一项大型前列腺癌筛查随机试验中直肠指检的观察者间变异性。
Prostate. 2008 Jun 15;68(9):985-93. doi: 10.1002/pros.20759.
2
The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.在鹿特丹进行的欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)中,直肠指检在后续筛查访视中的作用。
Eur Urol. 2008 Sep;54(3):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.104. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
3
Digital rectal examination and the diagnosis of prostate cancer--a study based on 8 years and three screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.直肠指检与前列腺癌诊断——基于欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)中 8 年和 3 次筛查的研究,鹿特丹。
Eur Urol. 2009 Jan;55(1):139-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.079. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
4
Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators.前列腺癌风险预测:前列腺体积和直肠指检在 ERSPC 风险计算器中的作用。
Eur Urol. 2012 Mar;61(3):577-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.012. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
5
Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men.直肠指检和经直肠超声检查在解读阿拉伯男性血清前列腺特异性抗原值以筛查前列腺癌中的相对贡献。
Ann Saudi Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;27(2):73-8. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2007.73.
6
[Yield of ultrasonography-guided transrectal biopsy in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate].[超声引导下经直肠前列腺穿刺活检在前列腺癌诊断中的阳性率]
Arch Esp Urol. 1995 Jul-Aug;48(6):587-94.
7
Screening for prostate cancer at low PSA range: the impact of digital rectal examination on tumor incidence and tumor characteristics.低前列腺特异抗原(PSA)范围的前列腺癌筛查:直肠指检对肿瘤发病率和肿瘤特征的影响。
Prostate. 2007 Feb 1;67(2):154-61. doi: 10.1002/pros.20501.
8
Predictors for biopsy outcome in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam region).欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(鹿特丹地区)活检结果的预测因素
Prostate. 1999 Jun 1;39(4):316-22. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(19990601)39:4<316::aid-pros14>3.0.co;2-o.
9
Stratification of prostate-specific antigen level and results of transrectal ultrasonography and digital rectal examination as predictors of positive prostate biopsy.前列腺特异性抗原水平分层以及经直肠超声检查和直肠指检结果作为前列腺活检阳性预测指标
Can Assoc Radiol J. 1997 Aug;48(4):252-8.
10
[Early diagnosis of prostatic cancer with digital rectal examination, PSA determination, and endorectal echography. Correlations with the morphologic diagnosis in 200 consecutive cases].[通过直肠指检、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)测定及直肠内超声检查对前列腺癌进行早期诊断。200例连续病例与形态学诊断的相关性]
Prog Urol. 1992 Dec;2(6):973-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Brachytherapy monotherapy for favorable and select unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer.近距离放射治疗单药治疗预后良好和部分预后不良的中危前列腺癌。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1038/s41391-025-01021-3.
2
Cost effectiveness analysis of prostate cancer screening strategies in Germany: A microsimulation study.德国前列腺癌筛查策略的成本效益分析:一项微观模拟研究。
Int J Cancer. 2025 Oct 15;157(8):1662-1679. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35513. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
3
Revolutionizing Prostate Cancer Detection: The Role of Approved PSMA-PET Imaging Agents.
革新前列腺癌检测:已获批的PSMA-PET显像剂的作用
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jun 17;18(6):906. doi: 10.3390/ph18060906.
4
Integration of magnetic resonance imaging and deep learning for prostate cancer detection: a systematic review.磁共振成像与深度学习整合用于前列腺癌检测的系统评价
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2025 Apr 25;13(2):69-91. doi: 10.62347/CSIJ8326. eCollection 2025.
5
Evaluating prostate cancer diagnostic methods: The role and relevance of digital rectal examination in modern era.评估前列腺癌诊断方法:现代数字直肠指检的作用及相关性。
Investig Clin Urol. 2025 May;66(3):181-187. doi: 10.4111/icu.20240456.
6
PSA-density, DRE, and PI-RADS 5: potential surrogates for omitting biopsy?PSA 密度、DRE 和 PI-RADS 5:是否可以作为省略活检的替代指标?
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 20;42(1):182. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04894-6.
7
Molecular classifications of prostate cancer: basis for individualized risk stratification and precision therapy.前列腺癌的分子分类:个体化风险分层和精准治疗的基础。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2279235. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2279235. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
8
Integrating CT-based radiomic model with clinical features improves long-term prognostication in high-risk prostate cancer.将基于CT的影像组学模型与临床特征相结合可改善高危前列腺癌的长期预后。
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 27;13:1060687. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1060687. eCollection 2023.
9
To what extent are anorectal function tests comparable? A study comparing digital rectal examination, anal electromyography, 3-dimensional high-resolution anal manometry, and transperineal ultrasound.肛门直肠功能测试的可比性如何?一项比较直肠指检、肛门肌电图、三维高分辨率肛门测压和经会阴超声的研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jan 16;38(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04304-6.
10
Propensity score matching analysis comparing radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy in locally advanced prostate cancer.局部晚期前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术与放疗联合雄激素剥夺治疗的倾向评分匹配分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 21;12(1):12480. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16700-7.