Kaczmarczyk Ireneusz, Kraśniak Andrzej, Drozdz Maciej, Chowaniec Eve, Gajda Mariusz, Radziszewski Andrzej, Sułowicz Władysław
Departament of Nephrology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Przegl Lek. 2007;64(7-8):476-82.
An accurate evaluation of water content in the body of hemodialyzed patients seems to be an important problem in chronic dialysotherapy. Acute intradialytic hypotension observed in 20-33% of hemodialysis patients is a very common complication of this kind of renal replacement therapy. The study was performed in 40 uremic patients, treated with hemodialysis at the Nephrology Clinic of the University Hospital in Cracow. In every patient, 3 model dialysis sessions were carried out. Total fluid removal was the same during every hemodialysis. The first model hemodialysis (HD1) was performed with constant dialysate sodium concentration (140 mmol/L), the second (HD2) with linear and the third (HD3) with expotential decrease of dialysate sodium concentration (from 144 to 136 mmol/L). Every hemodialysis was also monitored continuously with Crit-Line 2 R system (In-Line Diagnostics, Riverdale, UT). Before and after the first model hemodialysis (HD1), ultrasound examination of abdominal cavity was performed. The measurement of inferior vena cava diameter (mm), circumference (mm), area (mm2), at hepatic veins orifice-level, on expiration was performed. The fluid removal during the first model hemodialysis resulted in significant reduction of the vena cava inferior diameter, circumference and area, measured with ultrasound on expiration. The statistically significant lower fall of blood volume after the first and second hour of the second model hemodialysis session (HD2) was observed when compared to the first hemodialysis (HD1) - p<0.05 was observed. The statistically significant lower frequency of hypotension during the second hemo-dialysis session (HD2) as compared to HD1 (chi2=5.25 p<0.05). Differences among HD1 and HD3 and HD2 and HD3 did not reach statistical significance. The monitoring of hemodialysis with the Crit-Line instrument permits for optimalization of dry weight of dialyzed patients and allows reaching higher ultrafiltration rates during dialysis without hypotensive episodes. The changes in the blood volume, approximately 5% per one hour of dialysis session are an optimal value for these patients.
准确评估血液透析患者体内的水分含量似乎是慢性透析治疗中的一个重要问题。在20%至33%的血液透析患者中观察到的急性透析中低血压是这种肾脏替代治疗非常常见的并发症。该研究在克拉科夫大学医院肾脏病诊所接受血液透析治疗的40名尿毒症患者中进行。对每位患者进行了3次模拟透析治疗。每次血液透析期间的总液体清除量相同。第一次模拟血液透析(HD1)采用恒定透析液钠浓度(140 mmol/L)进行,第二次(HD2)采用透析液钠浓度呈线性下降进行,第三次(HD3)采用透析液钠浓度呈指数下降(从144 mmol/L降至136 mmol/L)进行。每次血液透析还使用Crit-Line 2 R系统(在线诊断公司,犹他州河谷市)进行连续监测。在第一次模拟血液透析(HD1)之前和之后,对腹腔进行超声检查。在呼气时,在肝静脉开口水平测量下腔静脉直径(mm)、周长(mm)、面积(mm²)。第一次模拟血液透析期间的液体清除导致呼气时超声测量的下腔静脉直径、周长和面积显著减小。与第一次血液透析(HD1)相比,观察到第二次模拟血液透析治疗(HD2)第一小时和第二小时后血容量下降在统计学上显著更低——观察到p<0.05。与HD1相比,第二次血液透析治疗(HD2)期间低血压的发生频率在统计学上显著更低(卡方=5.25,p<0.05)。HD1与HD3以及HD2与HD3之间的差异未达到统计学显著性。使用Crit-Line仪器监测血液透析可优化透析患者的干体重,并允许在透析期间达到更高的超滤率而不发生低血压发作。对于这些患者,每透析一小时血容量变化约5%是一个最佳值。