Virginia Institute for Psychiatry and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(4):300-16. doi: 10.1002/da.20491.
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has undergone a series of revisions in its diagnostic criteria that has moved it, nosologically, away from its original affiliation with panic disorder (PD) and closer to major depressive disorder (MDD). This, together with its high comorbidity and putative shared genetic risk with MDD, has brought into question its place in future psychiatric nosology, prompting the planners of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-V (DSM-V) and International Classification of Diseases-11 (ICD-11) to set up a workgroup tasked to better understand the relationship between GAD and MDD. This review attempts to summarize the extant data to compare GAD and MDD on a series of research validators to explore this relationship. Although insufficient data currently exist for GAD in several key validator classes, tentative conclusions can be drawn on the diagnostic status of GAD in relation to MDD. Although GAD possesses substantial overlap with MDD in the areas of genetics, childhood environment, demographics, and personality traits, this tends to hold true for other anxiety disorders (ADs) as well, with the strongest evidence for PD. Data from life events, personality disorders, biology, comorbidity, and pharmacology are mixed, showing some areas of similarity between GAD and MDD but some clear differences, again with a moderate degree of nonspecificity. Thus, although the bulk of evidence supports a close underlying relationship between them, the relatively nonspecific nature of these findings provides little more reason to question the nosologic validity of GAD in relation to MDD than that of some other anxiety disorders.
广泛性焦虑障碍 (GAD) 在其诊断标准方面经历了一系列修订,使其在分类学上从最初与惊恐障碍 (PD) 的关联转移到更接近重度抑郁障碍 (MDD)。再加上其高共病性和与 MDD 的假定共同遗传风险,这引发了人们对其在未来精神疾病分类学中的地位的质疑,促使《精神疾病诊断与统计手册-第五版》(DSM-V) 和《国际疾病分类-第十一版》(ICD-11) 的规划者成立了一个工作组,负责更好地了解 GAD 和 MDD 之间的关系。本综述试图总结现有数据,通过一系列研究验证器比较 GAD 和 MDD,以探讨这种关系。尽管目前在几个关键验证器类别中 GAD 的数据不足,但可以就 GAD 与 MDD 的诊断地位得出初步结论。尽管 GAD 在遗传学、儿童期环境、人口统计学和人格特质等领域与 MDD 有很大的重叠,但这种情况也同样适用于其他焦虑障碍 (ADs),PD 的证据最强。生活事件、人格障碍、生物学、共病和药理学的数据则较为复杂,显示出 GAD 和 MDD 之间存在一些相似之处,但也存在一些明显的差异,且特异性较低。因此,尽管大部分证据支持它们之间存在密切的潜在关系,但这些发现的相对非特异性并没有提供更多理由来质疑 GAD 在与 MDD 相关的分类学有效性,而只能说与其他一些焦虑障碍相比,这一理由也没有强多少。