Suppr超能文献

广泛性焦虑症的研究用诊断标准(RDC)、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)诊断标准的比较

Comparison of RDC, DSM-III, DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for generalized anxiety disorder.

作者信息

Wolk S I, Horwath E, Goldstein R B, Wickramaratne P, Weissman M M

机构信息

Division of Clinical and Genetic Epidemiology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA.

出版信息

Anxiety. 1996;2(2):71-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:2<71::AID-ANXI2>3.0.CO;2-G.

Abstract

The diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has been controversial since its inception. It remains unclear whether more stringent diagnostic criteria, such as in DSM-III-R, have improved the validity of GAD. Family studies suggest that GAD aggregates at least weakly in families of probands with GAD, and support the separation of panic disorder (PD) and GAD. Therefore, we can use a family study design to examine the validity of GAD. Independent familial transmission of GAD supports the validity of GAD. We report here the risk of GAD according to RDC, DSM-III, and DSM-III-R criteria in the first-degree relatives of probands from four diagnostic groups: panic disorder, panic disorder with major depression, early-onset major depression (MDD), and normal controls. We did not find an elevated risk of DSM-III or DSM-III-R GAD in the relatives of any of the ill proband groups compared to the relatives of the never mentally ill when controlling for proband comorbidity for GAD. In contrast, RDC GAD aggregates in the first-degree relatives of probands from both of the PD proband groups (with and without MDD) compared to relatives of the normal control group. The inclusion of cases of subsyndromal panic attacks that did not meet the strict RDC for panic disorder as meeting the less restrictive RDC for GAD may partially account for the familial aggregation of RDC panic disorder and RDC GAD. RDC GAD seems to identify one or more syndrome(s) that may be on the familial spectrum of panic disorder. This syndrome may represent a mild or early variant of panic disorder. We also found a trend for RDC and DSM-III GAD to aggregate in the first-degree relatives of the MDD proband group compared to the relatives of the never mentally ill controls. These data suggest that GAD demonstrates more independent familial transmission from PD and MDD when defined by DSM-III-R criteria than when defined by RDC or DSM-III, and thus support the validity of DSM-III-R GAD.

摘要

广泛性焦虑症(GAD)自被提出以来,其诊断一直存在争议。目前尚不清楚诸如《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》(DSM - III - R)中更为严格的诊断标准是否提高了GAD诊断的有效性。家族研究表明,GAD至少在患有GAD的先证者家族中存在轻度聚集现象,这支持了惊恐障碍(PD)与GAD的区分。因此,我们可以采用家族研究设计来检验GAD的有效性。GAD的独立家族传递支持了GAD的有效性。我们在此报告了来自四个诊断组(惊恐障碍、伴有重度抑郁的惊恐障碍、早发性重度抑郁(MDD)和正常对照组)的先证者一级亲属中,根据研究诊断标准(RDC)、DSM - III和DSM - III - R标准诊断为GAD的风险。在控制先证者GAD共病的情况下,与从未患过精神疾病者的亲属相比,我们未发现任何患病先证者组的亲属中,DSM - III或DSM - III - R诊断的GAD风险有所升高。相比之下,与正常对照组亲属相比,来自两个PD先证者组(伴有和不伴有MDD)的先证者一级亲属中,RDC诊断的GAD存在聚集现象。将未达到惊恐障碍严格RDC标准的亚综合征惊恐发作病例纳入符合GAD宽松RDC标准的病例中,可能部分解释了RDC惊恐障碍和RDC GAD的家族聚集现象。RDC GAD似乎识别出了一种或多种可能处于惊恐障碍家族谱系中的综合征。这种综合征可能代表惊恐障碍的轻度或早期变体。我们还发现,与从未患过精神疾病的对照组亲属相比,MDD先证者组的一级亲属中,RDC和DSM - III诊断的GAD有聚集趋势。这些数据表明,与RDC或DSM - III定义的情况相比,当按照DSM - III - R标准定义时,GAD表现出更多与PD和MDD无关的家族传递性,因此支持了DSM - III - R诊断GAD的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验