Suppr超能文献

男性激素避孕:一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

Male hormonal contraception: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

作者信息

Mommers Ellen, Kersemaekers Wendy M, Elliesen Jörg, Kepers Marc, Apter Dan, Behre Hermann M, Beynon Jennifer, Bouloux Pierre M, Costantino Antonietta, Gerbershagen Hans-Peter, Grønlund Lars, Heger-Mahn Doris, Huhtaniemi Ilpo, Koldewijn Evert L, Lange Corinna, Lindenberg Svend, Meriggiola M Cristina, Meuleman Eric, Mulders Peter F A, Nieschlag Eberhard, Perheentupa Antti, Solomon Andrew, Väisälä Leena, Wu Frederick C, Zitzmann Michael

机构信息

Global Clinical Development Department, Organon, part of Schering-Plough, Oss, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Jul;93(7):2572-80. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0265. Epub 2008 Apr 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to assess spermatogenesis suppression and safety of a new combination of an etonogestrel (ENG) implant combined with testosterone undecanoate (TU) injections for male contraception. This is the first large placebo-controlled study for male hormonal contraception.

DESIGN AND STUDY SUBJECTS

In this double-blind, multicenter study, we randomly assigned 354 healthy men to receive either a low- or high-release ENG implant sc combined with im TU injections (750 mg every 10 or 12 wk or 1000 mg every 12 wk) or placebo implant and injections. Treatment duration was 42 or 44 wk and posttreatment follow-up at least 24 wk.

RESULTS

Overall, spermatogenesis was suppressed to 1 million/ml or less at wk 16 in 89% of men, with approximately 94% in two high-release ENG groups. Suppression was maintained up to the end of the treatment period in 91% of men. For all men who completed the treatment period, 3% never achieved 1 million/ml or less. Median recovery time to a sperm concentration above 20 million/ml was 15 wk (mean 17 wk, 95% confidence interval 16-18 wk). Treatment was well tolerated. As compared with the placebo group, more men in the active treatment groups reported adverse events such as weight gain, mood changes, acne, sweating, or libido change. For both spermatogenesis suppression and safety, differences were small between the active treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of an ENG implant with TU injections is a well-tolerated male hormonal method, providing effective and reversible suppression of spermatogenesis. Although the results are good, there is still room for improvement, possibly by adjusting the dose regimen or changing the mode of application.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估依托孕烯(ENG)植入剂与十一酸睾酮(TU)注射剂联合使用对男性避孕的生精抑制作用及安全性。这是第一项针对男性激素避孕的大型安慰剂对照研究。

设计与研究对象

在这项双盲、多中心研究中,我们将354名健康男性随机分为两组,一组接受低剂量或高剂量释放的ENG皮下植入剂联合肌肉注射TU(每10或12周注射750mg,或每12周注射1000mg),另一组接受安慰剂植入剂和注射剂。治疗持续时间为42或44周,治疗后随访至少24周。

结果

总体而言,89%的男性在第16周时精子发生被抑制至100万/ml或更低,两个高剂量释放ENG组中这一比例约为94%。91%的男性在治疗期结束前一直维持抑制状态。在所有完成治疗期的男性中,3%的人从未达到100万/ml或更低。精子浓度恢复至高于2000万/ml的中位恢复时间为15周(平均17周,95%置信区间16 - 18周)。治疗耐受性良好。与安慰剂组相比,活性治疗组中有更多男性报告出现体重增加、情绪变化、痤疮、出汗或性欲改变等不良事件。在生精抑制和安全性方面,活性治疗组之间差异较小。

结论

ENG植入剂与TU注射剂联合使用是一种耐受性良好的男性激素避孕方法,能有效且可逆地抑制精子发生。尽管结果良好,但仍有改进空间,可能通过调整剂量方案或改变给药方式来实现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验