Dimond Bridgit
University of Glamorgan, Wales, UK.
Br J Nurs. 2008;17(3):182-4. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.3.28408.
In this series of articles on the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) the author now turns to the interrelation between mental capacity and mental disorder and between the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA) (as amended by the Mental Health Act 2007 [MHA, 2007]) and the Bournewood safeguards. The article explains how the MCA and the MHA are designed to cover distinct situations: the one mental capacity; the other mental disorder and the different definitions are considered. The article also looks at the different principles which apply and the different powers available under each Act. The different forms of protection under each Act are contrasted. Because of criticism of the UK by the European Court of Human Rights in the Bournewood case, amendments have been made by the MHA 2007 to the MCA to provide protection for those incapable of making decisions who suffer from mental disorder and whose best interests require a loss of liberty.
在这一系列关于《2005年精神能力法案》(MCA)的文章中,作者现在转向探讨精神能力与精神障碍之间的相互关系,以及《1983年精神健康法案》(MHA)(经《2007年精神健康法案》[MHA, 2007]修订)与伯恩伍德保障措施之间的关系。本文解释了MCA和MHA如何旨在涵盖不同的情况:一个是精神能力;另一个是精神障碍,并对不同的定义进行了考量。本文还审视了适用的不同原则以及每项法案所赋予的不同权力。对比了每项法案下不同形式的保护。由于欧洲人权法院在伯恩伍德案中对英国提出批评,《2007年精神健康法案》对《精神能力法案》进行了修订,以保护那些患有精神障碍、无法做出决定且其最大利益要求限制自由的人。