Misra S P, Dwivedi M
Department of Gastroenterology, Motilal Nehru Medical College, Allahabad, India.
Trop Gastroenterol. 2007 Oct-Dec;28(4):162-5.
Needle knife precut papillotomy has been used to gain access or remove impacted common bile duct stones at the ampulla of Vater. However, precut papillotomy is a risky procedure with high complication rates and is presumably best dealt with by the expert. We attempted to find out the feasibility of performing conventional endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with impacted stones at the ampulla.
All patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for stones impacted at the ampulla between the years 2000 and 2005 were enrolled in the study. All attempts were made to achieve biliary cannulation through the conventional route including use of the long route or guidewire to cannulate the papilla. Needle knife papillotomy was resorted to only if attempts to cannulate the papilla through the conventional route failed. The success and complications of the procedures were recorded.
Thirty-two patients were enrolled. The impacted bile duct stone could be removed in all the patients. Conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy were performed in 23 patients with impacted stones. The long route had to be employed in seven patients while guidewire cannulation of the papilla was needed in four patients. Needle knife papillotomy was needed in only nine patients. None of the patients in whom the conventional route was employed developed complications, whereas bleed requiring endoscopic management was observed in three (33%) of the nine patients in whom needle knife papillotomy was performed.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy can be performed by the conventional route in the majority of patients with impacted stones at the ampulla. This approach appears to be safer than needle knife papillotomy. However, needle knife papillotomy may be required in patients in whom biliary access cannot be gained through the conventional approach.
针刀乳头预切开术已用于在十二指肠乳头处进入或取出嵌顿的胆总管结石。然而,乳头预切开术是一种风险较高、并发症发生率高的手术,可能最好由专家来处理。我们试图探讨对十二指肠乳头嵌顿结石患者进行传统内镜括约肌切开术的可行性。
纳入2000年至2005年间因十二指肠乳头嵌顿结石而接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的所有患者。均尝试通过传统途径实现胆管插管,包括使用长途径或导丝对乳头进行插管。只有在通过传统途径插管乳头失败时才采用针刀乳头切开术。记录手术的成功率和并发症情况。
共纳入32例患者。所有患者的嵌顿胆管结石均得以取出。23例嵌顿结石患者接受了传统内镜逆行胰胆管造影术和内镜括约肌切开术。7例患者需要采用长途径,4例患者需要导丝插管乳头。仅9例患者需要针刀乳头切开术。采用传统途径的患者均未发生并发症,而在接受针刀乳头切开术的9例患者中有3例(33%)出现需要内镜处理的出血。
对于大多数十二指肠乳头嵌顿结石患者,可通过传统途径进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术和内镜括约肌切开术。这种方法似乎比针刀乳头切开术更安全。然而,对于无法通过传统途径实现胆管进入的患者,可能需要进行针刀乳头切开术。