Jeyaratnam Dakshika, Whitty Christopher J M, Phillips Katie, Liu Dongmei, Orezzi Christina, Ajoku Uchechukwu, French Gary L
Department of Infection, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London.
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):927-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39525.579063.BE. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
To determine whether introducing a rapid test for meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening leads to a reduction in MRSA acquisition on hospital general wards.
Cluster randomised crossover trial.
Medical, surgical, elderly care, and oncology wards of a London teaching hospital on two sites.
MRSA acquisition rate (proportion of patients negative for MRSA who became MRSA positive).
All patients admitted to the study wards who were MRSA negative on admission and screened for MRSA on discharge.
Rapid polymerase chain reaction based screening test for MRSA compared with conventional culture.
Of 9608 patients admitted to study wards, 8374 met entry criteria and 6888 had full data (82.3%); 3335 in the control arm and 3553 in the rapid test arm. The overall MRSA carriage rate on admission was 6.7%. Rapid tests led to a reduction in median reporting time from admission, from 46 to 22 hours (P<0.001). Rapid testing also reduced the number of inappropriate pre-emptive isolation days between the control and intervention arms (399 v 277, P<0.001). This was not seen in other measurements of resource use. MRSA was acquired by 108 (3.2%) patients in the control arm and 99 (2.8%) in the intervention arm. When predefined confounding factors were taken into account the adjusted odds ratio was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 1.234). Rates of MRSA transmission, wound infection, and bacteraemia were not statistically different between the two arms.
A rapid test for MRSA led to the quick receipt of results and had an impact on bed usage. No evidence was found of a significant reduction in MRSA acquisition and on these data it is unlikely that the increased costs of rapid tests can be justified compared with alternative control measures against MRSA.
Clinical controlled trials ISRCTN75590122 [controlled-trials.com].
确定引入耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)快速检测用于医院普通病房筛查是否能降低MRSA感染率。
整群随机交叉试验。
伦敦一家教学医院两个院区的内科、外科、老年护理和肿瘤科病房。
MRSA感染率(入院时MRSA检测阴性但出院时变为阳性的患者比例)。
所有入住研究病房、入院时MRSA检测阴性且出院时接受MRSA筛查的患者。
基于快速聚合酶链反应的MRSA筛查试验与传统培养法比较。
入住研究病房的9608例患者中,8374例符合入选标准,6888例有完整数据(82.3%);对照组3335例,快速检测组3553例。入院时MRSA总体携带率为6.7%。快速检测使从入院到报告结果的中位时间从46小时缩短至22小时(P<0.001)。快速检测还减少了对照组和干预组之间不适当的预防性隔离天数(399天对277天,P<0.001)。在其他资源使用指标中未观察到这种情况。对照组有108例(3.2%)患者感染MRSA,干预组有99例(2.8%)。考虑到预先定义的混杂因素后,调整后的优势比为0.91(95%置信区间0.61至1.234)。两组之间MRSA传播率、伤口感染率和菌血症发生率无统计学差异。
MRSA快速检测能使结果快速获得,并对床位使用产生影响。未发现有证据表明MRSA感染率显著降低,基于这些数据,与其他控制MRSA的措施相比,快速检测增加的成本不太可能是合理的。
临床对照试验ISRCTN75590122 [controlled-trials.com] 。