Suppr超能文献

基于证据的股动脉穿刺与闭合方法。

An evidence-based approach to femoral arterial access and closure.

作者信息

Turi Zoltan G

机构信息

Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Winter;9(1):7-18.

Abstract

Percutaneous arterial access is performed in up to 10 million patients worldwide annually. The predominant techniques have been largely unchanged for a half century, but an evolving evidence base over the past several years suggests that major improvements in access and a reduction in complication rates may be accomplished with a better appreciation of anatomy and the use of fluoroscopy or ultrasound guidance. Vascular closure is still predominantly by manual compression; meta-analyses comparing vascular closure techniques have not clearly demonstrated a difference between manual compression and vascular closure device complication rates. Although vascular closure devices are associated with earlier hemostasis and time to ambulation, their cost and potential associated complications limit use to roughly 30% of cases in the United States and single digit percentages in the rest of the world.

摘要

全球每年有多达1000万患者接受经皮动脉穿刺。在过去半个世纪里,主要技术基本没有变化,但过去几年不断发展的证据表明,通过更好地了解解剖结构并使用荧光透视或超声引导,可以在穿刺方面取得重大进展并降低并发症发生率。血管闭合仍主要依靠手动压迫;比较血管闭合技术的荟萃分析并未明确显示手动压迫与血管闭合装置的并发症发生率之间存在差异。尽管血管闭合装置能实现更早止血和更快下床活动,但因其成本及潜在相关并发症,在美国约30%的病例中使用,在世界其他地区使用比例仅为个位数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验