Mornieux G, Stapelfeldt B, Gollhofer A, Belli A
Institut für Sport und Sportwissenschaft, Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Int J Sports Med. 2008 Oct;29(10):817-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038374. Epub 2008 Apr 17.
The aim of this study was to determine the influence of different shoe-pedal interfaces and of an active pulling-up action during the upstroke phase on the pedalling technique. Eight elite cyclists (C) and seven non-cyclists (NC) performed three different bouts at 90 rev . min (-1) and 60 % of their maximal aerobic power. They pedalled with single pedals (PED), with clipless pedals (CLIP) and with a pedal force feedback (CLIPFBACK) where subjects were asked to pull up on the pedal during the upstroke. There was no significant difference for pedalling effectiveness, net mechanical efficiency (NE) and muscular activity between PED and CLIP. When compared to CLIP, CLIPFBACK resulted in a significant increase in pedalling effectiveness during upstroke (86 % for C and 57 % NC, respectively), as well as higher biceps femoris and tibialis anterior muscle activity (p < 0.001). However, NE was significantly reduced (p < 0.008) with 9 % and 3.3 % reduction for C and NC, respectively. Consequently, shoe-pedal interface (PED vs. CLIP) did not significantly influence cycling technique during submaximal exercise. However, an active pulling-up action on the pedal during upstroke increased the pedalling effectiveness, while reducing net mechanical efficiency.
本研究的目的是确定不同的鞋-踏板界面以及上冲程阶段的主动提拉动作对蹬踏技术的影响。八名精英自行车运动员(C组)和七名非自行车运动员(NC组)在90转·分钟⁻¹和其最大有氧功率的60%的条件下进行了三轮不同的骑行。他们分别使用单踏板(PED)、无鞋带踏板(CLIP)以及带有踏板力反馈的无鞋带踏板(CLIPFBACK,要求受试者在上冲程时向上提拉踏板)进行蹬踏。PED和CLIP在蹬踏效率、净机械效率(NE)和肌肉活动方面没有显著差异。与CLIP相比,CLIPFBACK导致上冲程时蹬踏效率显著提高(C组和NC组分别提高了86%和57%),同时股二头肌和胫骨前肌的活动也增强(p<0.001)。然而,NE显著降低(p<0.008),C组和NC组分别降低了9%和3.3%。因此,在次最大强度运动期间,鞋-踏板界面(PED与CLIP)对骑行技术没有显著影响。然而,上冲程时对踏板的主动提拉动作提高了蹬踏效率,同时降低了净机械效率。