Suppr超能文献

万古霉素用于治疗艰难梭菌感染:这种昂贵的药物究竟对谁有神奇疗效?

Vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection: for whom is this expensive bullet really magic?

作者信息

Pepin Jacques

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2008 May 15;46(10):1493-8. doi: 10.1086/587656.

Abstract

The epidemiology, clinical severity, and case-fatality ratio of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) changed dramatically with the emergence of a toxin hyperproducing strain (BI/NAP1/027) in North America and Europe in 2000. For the treatment of CDI, metronidazole and vancomycin remain the 2 most commonly used drugs. The 3 randomized controlled trials published thus far, as well as the upcoming tolevamer trial, use intermediate outcomes, rather than the outcomes that now preoccupy clinicians: the frequency of complications or recurrence. The major advantage of metronidazole is its low price. The major advantage of orally administered vancomycin is its more favorable pharmacokinetics. Facilitating vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization and/or infection is a potential drawback of both drugs. Pending the development of a prospectively validated scoring system, members of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America expert committee will define severe CDI as present in any patient with a leukocyte count > or =15,000 cells/mm(3) or a creatinine level increased by > or =50% from baseline. For patients with mild-to-moderate CDI (defined by a leukocyte count <15000 cells/mm(3) and a creatinine level <1.5 times the baseline value), there is no evidence that treatment with vancomycin is superior to treatment with metronidazole (even for intermediate outcomes), and metronidazole therapy should be preferred. For patients with severe CDI who are not infected with BI/NAP1/027, there is reasonable evidence that the better pharmacokinetics of vancomycin translate into a lower probability of complications. For those patients who are infected with BI/NAP1/027, the superiority of vancomycin therapy remains to be proven. In practice, because it is not yet possible to rapidly type the strains, all patients with severe CDI should be treated with vancomycin. Future trials should use complicated CDI and recurrences as their primary outcomes.

摘要

2000年北美和欧洲出现产毒超量菌株(BI/NAP1/027)后,艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的流行病学、临床严重程度及病死率发生了显著变化。对于CDI的治疗,甲硝唑和万古霉素仍是最常用的两种药物。迄今为止发表的3项随机对照试验以及即将开展的替考拉宁试验,采用的都是中间结局指标,而非目前临床医生关注的结局指标:并发症或复发的发生率。甲硝唑的主要优势在于价格低廉。口服万古霉素的主要优势在于其药代动力学特性更佳。这两种药物的一个潜在缺点是会促进耐万古霉素肠球菌的定植和/或感染。在尚未开发出经过前瞻性验证的评分系统之前,美国感染病学会/美国医疗保健流行病学学会专家委员会成员将严重CDI定义为白细胞计数≥15,000个/mm³或肌酐水平较基线升高≥50%的任何患者。对于轻至中度CDI患者(定义为白细胞计数<15000个/mm³且肌酐水平<基线值的1.5倍),没有证据表明万古霉素治疗优于甲硝唑治疗(即使对于中间结局指标也是如此),应首选甲硝唑治疗。对于未感染BI/NAP1/027的严重CDI患者,有合理证据表明万古霉素更好的药代动力学特性可转化为更低的并发症发生概率。对于那些感染了BI/NAP1/027的患者,万古霉素治疗的优越性仍有待证实。在实际操作中,由于尚无法快速对菌株进行分型,所有严重CDI患者均应接受万古霉素治疗。未来的试验应以复杂CDI和复发作为主要结局指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验