Harboe Morten, Mollnes Tom Eirik
Institute of Immunology, University of Oslo and Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
J Cell Mol Med. 2008 Aug;12(4):1074-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00350.x. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
Alternative pathway amplification plays a major role for the final effect of initial specific activation of the classical and lectin complement pathways, but the quantitative role of the amplification is insufficiently investigated. In experimental models of human diseases in which a direct activation of alternative pathway has been assumed, this interpretation needs revision placing a greater role on alternative amplification. We recently documented that the alternative amplification contributed to 80-90% of C5 activation when the initial activation was highly specific for the classical pathway. The recent identification of properdin as a recognition factor directly initiating alternative pathway activation, like C1q in the classical and mannose-binding lectin in the lectin pathway initiates a renewed interest in the reaction mechanisms of complement. Complement and Toll-like receptors, including the CD14 molecule, are two main upstream recognition systems of innate immunity, contributing to the inflammatory reaction in a number of conditions including ischemia-reperfusion injury and sepsis. These systems act as "double-edged swords", being protective against microbial invasion, but harmful to the host when activated improperly or uncontrolled. Combined inhibition of complement and Toll-like receptors/CD14 should be explored as a treatment regimen to reduce the overwhelming damaging inflammatory response during sepsis. The alternative pathway should be particularly considered in this regard, due to its uncontrolled amplification in sepsis. The alternative pathway should be regarded as a dual system, namely a recognition pathway principally similar to the classical and lectin pathways, and an amplification mechanism, well known, but quantitatively probably more important than generally recognized.
旁路途径的放大作用对经典和凝集素补体途径初始特异性激活的最终效应起主要作用,但该放大作用的定量作用尚未得到充分研究。在假定旁路途径直接激活的人类疾病实验模型中,这种解释需要修正,应更加强调旁路途径放大作用的作用。我们最近记录到,当初始激活对经典途径具有高度特异性时,旁路途径的放大作用对C5激活的贡献达80% - 90%。最近发现备解素是直接启动旁路途径激活的识别因子,如同经典途径中的C1q和凝集素途径中的甘露糖结合凝集素,这重新引发了人们对补体反应机制的兴趣。补体和Toll样受体,包括CD14分子,是天然免疫的两个主要上游识别系统,在包括缺血再灌注损伤和脓毒症在内的多种情况下促成炎症反应。这些系统犹如“双刃剑”,既能抵御微生物入侵,但若激活不当或不受控制则会对宿主造成损害。应探索联合抑制补体和Toll样受体/CD14作为一种治疗方案,以减轻脓毒症期间过度的有害炎症反应。鉴于旁路途径在脓毒症中不受控制的放大作用,在这方面应特别考虑旁路途径。旁路途径应被视为一个双重系统,即一个主要类似于经典途径和凝集素途径的识别途径,以及一个虽为人熟知但在数量上可能比普遍认识更为重要的放大机制。