Tzovaras George, Zacharoulis Dimitris, Georgopoulou Stavroula, Pratsas Konstantinos, Stamatiou Georgia, Hatzitheofilou Constantine
Department of Surgery, University of Thessaly Medical School, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Am J Surg. 2008 Aug;196(2):191-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.028. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
Regional anesthesia has not been used as the sole anesthetic procedure in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair due to the fear of potential adverse effects of the pneumoperitoneum. However, there are recent reports on the feasibility of performing laparoscopic procedures, such as cholecystectomy, in fit patients, under spinal anesthesia alone. The current study aimed to detect the feasibility of performing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair under spinal anesthesia.
Twenty-five American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II patients underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with low-pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum under spinal anesthesia. In 9 cases the hernia was umbilical/para-umbilical, in 5 cases epigastric, and in 11 cases incisional. Intraoperative incidents, complications, postoperative pain, and recovery in general, as well as patient satisfaction at follow-up examination, were prospectively recorded.
All operations were completed laparoscopically and conversion from spinal to general anesthesia was not required in any of the cases. Median pain score at 4 hours postoperatively was .5 (range 0-5), at 8 hours 1.5 (range 0-6), and at 24 hours 1.5 (range 0-4). Most patients were discharged 24 hours after the operation; the median hospital stay was 1 day (range 1-3 days). At 2-weeks follow-up, no late complications were detected and all patients reported being satisfied with the anesthetic procedure.
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with low-pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum can be successfully and safely performed under spinal anesthesia. Furthermore, it seems that spinal anesthesia is associated with minimal postoperative pain and smooth recovery.
由于担心气腹的潜在不良影响,区域麻醉尚未被用作腹腔镜腹疝修补术的唯一麻醉方法。然而,最近有报道称,在合适的患者中,仅在脊麻下就可以进行诸如胆囊切除术等腹腔镜手术。本研究旨在检测在脊麻下进行腹腔镜腹疝修补术的可行性。
25例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I或II级患者在脊麻下接受了低压二氧化碳气腹的腹腔镜腹疝修补术。其中9例为脐部/脐旁疝,5例为上腹部疝,11例为切口疝。前瞻性记录术中事件、并发症、术后疼痛、总体恢复情况以及随访检查时的患者满意度。
所有手术均通过腹腔镜完成,所有病例均未需要从脊麻转为全麻。术后4小时的中位疼痛评分为0.5(范围0 - 5),8小时为1.5(范围0 - 6),24小时为1.5(范围0 - 4)。大多数患者在术后24小时出院;中位住院时间为1天(范围1 - 3天)。在2周的随访中,未发现晚期并发症,所有患者均报告对麻醉过程满意。
在脊麻下可以成功、安全地进行低压二氧化碳气腹的腹腔镜腹疝修补术。此外,脊麻似乎与术后疼痛最小和恢复顺利相关。