Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜切口疝修补术的特征描述。

Characterizing laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.

作者信息

Birch Daniel W

机构信息

Centre for the Advancement of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2007 Jun;50(3):195-201.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernias (LVIHRs) is feasible; however, many facets of this procedure remain poorly defined. The indications, essential technical features and postoperative management should be standardized to optimize outcomes and facilitate training in this promising approach to incisional hernia repair.

METHODS

All patients referred to one surgeon at a tertiary care centre for LVIHR from 1999 to 2004 were analyzed. Patient records were analyzed and perioperative outcomes were documented.

RESULTS

Of the 69 patients who were referred for management of incisional hernia, 64 underwent LVIHR. The mean age of patients selected for surgery was 61.4 years (28% of patients over age 70 years); their mean body mass index (BMI) was 32.8 kg/m2 and mean American Association of Anaesthetists (ASA) score was 2.5 (52% of patients had an ASA score equal to 3). The mean operating time was 130.7 minutes for a mean abdominal wall defect of 123.9 cm2 and a mean prosthetic mesh size of 344 cm2. Patients with recurrent incisional hernias and previous prosthetic mesh were the most challenging, with a mean BMI of 39 kg/m2, mean operating time of 191 minutes, mean defect of 224 cm2 and mean prosthetic mesh size of 508 cm2. One patient was converted to open surgery and, in 2 patients, small bowel injuries were repaired laparoscopically without adverse sequelae. The mean length of stay was 4.5 days (median 3.0 d). Postoperatively, 78% of patients developed seromas within the residual hernia sac. All seromas were managed nonoperatively; one-half resolved by 7 weeks, and larger seromas persisted for up to 24 weeks. There was an 18.7% rate of minor complications and a 3.1% rate of major complications (no deaths). After a mean follow-up of 7.7 months, 2 recurrent hernias (3.1%) were identified in patients with multiple previous open mesh repairs.

CONCLUSION

Although LVIHR may be challenging, it has the potential to be considered a primary approach for most ventral and incisional hernias, regardless of patient status or hernia complexity.

摘要

引言

腹腔镜修复腹直肌旁疝和切口疝(LVIHR)是可行的;然而,该手术的许多方面仍未明确界定。应规范手术适应症、关键技术要点和术后管理,以优化手术效果,并促进这种有前景的切口疝修复方法的培训。

方法

分析了1999年至2004年在一家三级医疗中心由一位外科医生接诊的所有因LVIHR前来就诊的患者。分析患者记录并记录围手术期结果。

结果

在69例因切口疝前来就诊的患者中,64例接受了LVIHR。接受手术的患者平均年龄为61.4岁(28%的患者年龄超过70岁);他们的平均体重指数(BMI)为32.8kg/m²,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)平均评分为2.5(52%的患者ASA评分为3)。平均腹壁缺损面积为123.9cm²,平均人工补片尺寸为344cm²,平均手术时间为130.7分钟。复发性切口疝和曾使用人工补片的患者最具挑战性,其平均BMI为39kg/m²,平均手术时间为191分钟,平均缺损面积为224cm²,平均人工补片尺寸为508cm²。1例患者转为开放手术,2例患者的小肠损伤在腹腔镜下修复,无不良后遗症。平均住院时间为4.5天(中位数为3.0天)。术后,78%的患者在残留疝囊内出现血清肿。所有血清肿均采用非手术治疗;一半在7周内消退,较大的血清肿持续长达24周。轻微并发症发生率为18.7%,严重并发症发生率为3.1%(无死亡病例)。平均随访7.7个月后,在多次接受开放补片修补术的患者中发现2例复发疝(3.1%)。

结论

尽管LVIHR可能具有挑战性,但无论患者状况或疝的复杂程度如何,它都有可能被视为大多数腹直肌旁疝和切口疝的主要治疗方法。

相似文献

7
Morbidity associated with laparoscopic repair of suprapubic hernias.耻骨上疝腹腔镜修补术相关的发病率
Am J Surg. 2008 Dec;196(6):983-7; discussion 987-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.08.006.

引用本文的文献

6
IPOM: history of an acronym.腹腔内补片修补术:一个首字母缩略词的历史。
Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):743-746. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1804-2. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

4
Laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia.腹腔镜治疗切口疝的方法。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jan;17(1):118-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9079-0. Epub 2002 Oct 29.
6
Recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜下腹疝修补术后复发
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jan;17(1):123-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8813-y. Epub 2002 Sep 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验