Suppr超能文献

胰腺导管评估:门静脉期64层螺旋CT的准确性

Pancreatic duct evaluation: accuracy of portal venous phase 64 MDCT.

作者信息

Anderson Stephan W, Soto Jorge A

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Abdom Imaging. 2009 Jan-Feb;34(1):55-63. doi: 10.1007/s00261-008-9396-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many patients presenting with nonspecific signs and symptoms often receive CT scans using general protocols, not optimized to evaluate for pancreatic pathology. Therefore the purpose of this study was to evaluate portal venous phase 64 multi-row detector CT (MDCT) scans for detecting pancreatic duct strictures, stones, pancreas divisum, and communication between pancreatic ducts and cystic pancreatic lesions.

METHODS

Institutional review board approval with waived informed consent was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. We included all patients that underwent abdominal, portal venous phase, intravenous contrast-enhanced 64 MDCT scans between 6/7/05 and 5/01/07 and MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP) within 2 months of the CT. This yielded 93 patients (42 males, 51 females) with a mean age of 59 years. In addition to CT, 75 patients underwent MRCP and 37 patients underwent ERCP. Two radiologists independently evaluated the CT images, including multiplanar and minimum intensity pixel projection reformations, for pancreatic duct strictures, stones, pancreas divisum, or cystic pancreatic lesions. The latter were classified as communicating or not communicating with the pancreatic ducts. Findings on ERCP or MRCP were used to calculate diagnostic performance parameters.

RESULTS

On standard of reference examinations, 15 (16%) of the 93 patients had a pancreatic duct stricture. The sensitivity and the specificity for Observer 1 were 87% and 100%, respectively; for Observer 2, 100% and 100%, respectively. Six (6%) of the 93 patients had main pancreatic duct stones. The sensitivity and the specificity for Observer 1 were 83% and 100%, respectively; for Observer 2, 100% and 99%, respectively. Five (5%) patients had pancreas divisum; Observer 1 correctly identified four and Observer 2 correctly identified three cases. Eleven (12%) patients had cystic pancreatic lesions. Observer 1 correctly determined whether or not there was communication between the cystic pancreatic lesion and the pancreatic duct in ten cases; Observer 2 correctly made this determination in nine cases.

CONCLUSION

Portal venous phase 64 MDCT images are moderately sensitive and highly specific for detecting pancreatic duct stricture, stones, and pancreas divisum and moderately accurate for detecting communication between pancreatic ducts and cystic pancreatic lesions.

摘要

背景

许多表现为非特异性体征和症状的患者通常接受使用通用方案的CT扫描,这些方案并非为评估胰腺病变而优化。因此,本研究的目的是评估门静脉期64排多层螺旋CT(MDCT)扫描在检测胰管狭窄、结石、胰腺分裂以及胰管与胰腺囊性病变之间的连通性方面的效果。

方法

本符合HIPAA规定的研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准,并免除了知情同意。我们纳入了所有在2005年6月7日至2007年5月1日期间接受腹部、门静脉期、静脉注射造影剂增强的64排MDCT扫描,且在CT检查后2个月内接受磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)或内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的患者。这产生了93例患者(42例男性,51例女性),平均年龄59岁。除CT外,75例患者接受了MRCP检查,37例患者接受了ERCP检查。两名放射科医生独立评估CT图像,包括多平面和最小强度像素投影重建,以检查胰管狭窄、结石、胰腺分裂或胰腺囊性病变。后者被分类为与胰管相通或不相通。ERCP或MRCP的检查结果用于计算诊断性能参数。

结果

在参考标准检查中,93例患者中有15例(16%)存在胰管狭窄。观察者1的敏感性和特异性分别为87%和100%;观察者2的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和100%。93例患者中有6例(6%)存在主胰管结石。观察者1的敏感性和特异性分别为83%和同;观察者2的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和99%。5例(5%)患者存在胰腺分裂;观察者1正确识别出4例,观察者2正确识别出3例。11例(12%)患者存在胰腺囊性病变。观察者1在10例病例中正确判断了胰腺囊性病变与胰管之间是否相通;观察者2在9例病例中正确做出了这一判断。

结论

门静脉期64排MDCT图像在检测胰管狭窄、结石和胰腺分裂方面具有中等敏感性和高特异性,在检测胰管与胰腺囊性病变之间的连通性方面具有中等准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验