Asayama Yoshiki, Fang Wei, Stolpen Alan, Kuehn David
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Emerg Radiol. 2012 Apr;19(2):121-5. doi: 10.1007/s10140-011-1008-x. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the diagnostic performance of multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) in an evaluation of pancreas divisum using endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) as the reference standard. We analyzed 41 consecutive patients (14 cases of pancreas divisum and 27 cases of standard anatomy) who had undergone both MDCT and ERP for the evaluation of clinically diagnosed acute pancreatitis between November 2004 and June 2007. The CT reconstruction thickness and interval were both 3 mm. Two radiologists independently reviewed CT data, and the diagnostic confidence in determining the pancreatic ductal anatomy was scored using a five-point scale. CT detectability was correlated with the severity of pancreatitis and the degree of pancreatic necrosis based on the Balthazar index. With consensus, 16 of 41 cases (39.0%) were evaluated as indeterminate. Ductal anatomy was correctly diagnosed in 23 of 41 cases (56.1%). Eight of 14 cases (57.1%) were correctly diagnosed as pancreas divisum. Standard anatomy was identified in 15 of 27 cases (55.6%). The inter-observer agreement was substantial (κ = 0.71). Grade B or more pancreatitis and the presence of pancreatic necrosis significantly influenced the evaluation of ductal anatomy (p = 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Pancreas divisum was correctly diagnosed in the case of grade A acute pancreatitis. The CT detectability of pancreas divisum in patients with grade B or more pancreatitis is still relatively low even in the MDCT era.
本研究的目的是,以逆行胰胆管造影术(ERP)作为参考标准,回顾性评估多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)在胰腺分裂症评估中的诊断性能。我们分析了2004年11月至2007年6月期间连续接受MDCT和ERP检查以评估临床诊断为急性胰腺炎的41例患者(14例胰腺分裂症患者和27例标准解剖结构患者)。CT重建层厚和层间距均为3毫米。两名放射科医生独立审查CT数据,并使用五点量表对确定胰管解剖结构的诊断信心进行评分。根据巴尔萨泽指数,CT可检测性与胰腺炎的严重程度和胰腺坏死程度相关。经共识,41例中有16例(39.0%)被评估为不确定。41例中有23例(56.1%)导管解剖结构被正确诊断。14例中有8例(57.1%)被正确诊断为胰腺分裂症。27例中有15例(55.6%)被确定为标准解剖结构。观察者间一致性较高(κ=0.71)。B级或更高级别的胰腺炎以及胰腺坏死的存在显著影响导管解剖结构的评估(p分别为0.01和p<0.01)。在A级急性胰腺炎病例中,胰腺分裂症被正确诊断。即使在MDCT时代,B级或更高级别胰腺炎患者中胰腺分裂症的CT可检测性仍然相对较低。