Haas David M, Ramsey Patrick S
Indiana University School of Medicine, Wishard Memorial Hospital, 1001 West 10th Street, F-5, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD003511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003511.pub2.
Progesterone, a female sex hormone, is known to induce secretory changes in the lining of the uterus essential for successful implantation of a fertilised egg. It has been suggested that a causative factor in many cases of miscarriage may be inadequate secretion of progesterone. Therefore, progestogens have been used, beginning in the first trimester of pregnancy, in an attempt to prevent spontaneous miscarriage.
To determine the efficacy and safety of progestogens as a preventative therapy against miscarriage.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2008), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2006), EMBASE (1980 to June 2006), CINAHL (1982 to June 2006), NHMRC Clinical Trials Register (June 2006) and Meta-Register (June 2006). We searched references from relevant articles, attempting to contact authors where necessary, and contacted experts in the field for unpublished works.
Randomised or quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing progestogens with placebo or no treatment given in an effort to prevent miscarriage.
Two review authors assessed trial quality and extracted data.
Fifteen trials (2118 women) are included. The meta-analysis of all women, regardless of gravidity and number of previous miscarriages, showed no statistically significant difference in the risk of miscarriage between progestogen and placebo or no treatment groups (Peto odds ratio (Peto OR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.24) and no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse effect in either mother or baby. In a subgroup analysis of three trials involving women who had recurrent miscarriages (three or more consecutive miscarriages), progestogen treatment showed a statistically significant decrease in miscarriage rate compared to placebo or no treatment (Peto OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.70). No statistically significant differences were found between the route of administration of progestogen (oral, intramuscular, vaginal) versus placebo or no treatment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support the routine use of progestogen to prevent miscarriage in early to mid-pregnancy. However, there seems to be evidence of benefit in women with a history of recurrent miscarriage. Treatment for these women may be warranted given the reduced rates of miscarriage in the treatment group and the finding of no statistically significant difference between treatment and control groups in rates of adverse effects suffered by either mother or baby in the available evidence. Larger trials are currently underway to inform treatment for this group of women.
孕酮作为一种女性性激素,已知可促使子宫内膜发生分泌期变化,这对受精卵成功着床至关重要。有人提出,许多流产病例的一个致病因素可能是孕酮分泌不足。因此,从妊娠早期开始就使用孕激素,试图预防自然流产。
确定孕激素作为预防流产的治疗方法的有效性和安全性。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2008年1月)、CENTRAL(Cochrane图书馆2006年第4期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2006年6月)、EMBASE(1980年至2006年6月)、CINAHL(1982年至2006年6月)、NHMRC临床试验注册库(2006年6月)和Meta注册库(2006年6月)。我们检索了相关文章的参考文献,必要时试图联系作者,并联系该领域的专家获取未发表的研究成果。
比较孕激素与安慰剂或不进行治疗以预防流产的随机或半随机对照试验。
两位综述作者评估试验质量并提取数据。
纳入了15项试验(2118名女性)。对所有女性(无论妊娠次数和既往流产次数)进行的荟萃分析显示,孕激素组与安慰剂组或未治疗组之间流产风险无统计学显著差异(Peto比值比(Peto OR)为0.98;95%置信区间(CI)为0.78至1.24),母婴不良反应发生率也无统计学显著差异。在三项涉及复发性流产(连续三次或更多次流产)女性的试验的亚组分析中,与安慰剂或不治疗相比,孕激素治疗的流产率有统计学显著降低(Peto OR为0.38;95%CI为0.20至0.70)。孕激素的给药途径(口服、肌肉注射、阴道给药)与安慰剂或不治疗之间未发现统计学显著差异。
没有证据支持在妊娠早期至中期常规使用孕激素预防流产。然而,对于有复发性流产史的女性似乎有获益证据。鉴于治疗组流产率降低,且现有证据显示治疗组与对照组在母婴不良反应发生率方面无统计学显著差异,对这些女性进行治疗可能是合理的。目前正在进行更大规模的试验,为这组女性的治疗提供依据。