Suppr超能文献

早产儿视网膜病变中血管迂曲度的计算机辅助定量分析(美国眼科学会论文)

Computer-assisted quantification of vascular tortuosity in retinopathy of prematurity (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

作者信息

Wallace David K

机构信息

Duke University Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;105:594-615.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Plus disease is severely abnormal dilation and tortuosity of posterior retinal blood vessels in infants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). It has become the major criterion for laser treatment in ROP, but its assessment is subjective and prone to error. ROPtool is a computer program that traces retinal blood vessels, measures their tortuosity, and determines whether there is sufficient tortuosity for plus disease. The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine if assessment of tortuosity by ROPtool is more accurate than by individual pediatric ophthalmologists.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-five high-quality RetCam images from premature infants were circulated to 3 ROP experts to develop reference data and to 3 other pediatric ophthalmologists ("examiners") who graded the tortuosity in each quadrant as normal, pre-plus, or plus. These same images were analyzed using ROPtool. Overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ROPtool relative to expert consensus were compared to that of the individual examiners.

RESULTS

By expert consensus, 37 of the 185 eyes (20%) had tortuosity sufficient for plus disease. The overall accuracy of ROPtool of 95% (175/185) for identifying tortuosity sufficient for plus disease was similar to that of examiner 1 (93%, 172/185, P = .5), examiner 2 (93%, 172/185, P = .5), and examiner 3 (91%, 168/185, P = .1). Sensitivity of ROPtool of 97% (36/37) was superior to that of examiner 1 (65%, 24/37, P < .001), examiner 2 (70%, 26/37, P < .001), and examiner 3 (81%, 30/37, P = .02). The mean tortuosity of quadrants with plus disease was 19.1 tortuosity units, compared to 9.9 tortuosity units for quadrants with pre-plus (P < .001) and 4.8 tortuosity units for normal quadrants (P < .001 for pre-plus vs normal).

CONCLUSIONS

ROPtool has excellent sensitivity and overall accuracy relative to expert consensus in the detection of tortuosity sufficient for plus disease. Computer-assisted analysis of retinal images has the potential to remove subjectivity from the determination of plus disease and to optimize the timing of follow-up and treatment for ROP.

摘要

目的

附加病变是早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)患儿视网膜后血管严重异常扩张和迂曲。它已成为ROP激光治疗的主要标准,但其评估具有主观性且容易出错。ROPtool是一种计算机程序,可追踪视网膜血管、测量其迂曲度,并确定是否存在足以诊断附加病变的迂曲度。本研究的目的是前瞻性地确定ROPtool对迂曲度的评估是否比个体小儿眼科医生更准确。

方法

将来自早产儿的185张高质量RetCam图像分发给3位ROP专家以制定参考数据,并分发给另外3位小儿眼科医生(“检查者”),他们将每个象限的迂曲度分为正常、附加病变前期或附加病变。使用ROPtool对这些相同的图像进行分析。将ROPtool相对于专家共识的总体准确性、敏感性和特异性与个体检查者的进行比较。

结果

根据专家共识,185只眼中有37只(20%)具有足以诊断附加病变的迂曲度。ROPtool识别足以诊断附加病变的迂曲度的总体准确性为95%(175/185),与检查者1(93%,172/185,P = 0.5)、检查者2(93%,172/185,P = 0.5)和检查者3(91%,168/185,P = 0.1)相似。ROPtool的敏感性为97%(36/37),优于检查者1(65%,24/37,P < 0.001)、检查者2(70%,26/37,P < 0.001)和检查者3(81%,30/37,P = 0.02)。附加病变象限的平均迂曲度为19.1个迂曲度单位,附加病变前期象限为9.9个迂曲度单位(P < 0.001),正常象限为4.8个迂曲度单位(附加病变前期与正常相比,P < 0.001)。

结论

相对于专家共识而言,ROPtool在检测足以诊断附加病变的迂曲度方面具有出色的敏感性和总体准确性。视网膜图像的计算机辅助分析有可能消除附加病变判定中的主观性,并优化ROP随访和治疗的时机。

相似文献

2
Accuracy of ROPtool vs individual examiners in assessing retinal vascular tortuosity.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;125(11):1523-30. doi: 10.1001/archopht.125.11.1523.
3
A pilot study using "ROPtool" to quantify plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity.
J AAPOS. 2007 Aug;11(4):381-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 May 29.
4
Evaluation of Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity by ROPtool or a Lay Reader.
Ophthalmology. 2016 Feb;123(2):385-390. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.048. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
5
Computer-assisted measurement of retinal vascular width and tortuosity in retinopathy of prematurity.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jul;128(7):847-52. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.133.
7
A pilot study using ROPtool to measure retinal vascular dilation.
Retina. 2009 Sep;29(8):1182-7. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181a46a73.
8
Tortuosity of arterioles and venules in quantifying plus disease.
J AAPOS. 2009 Apr;13(2):181-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.10.019.
9
Agreement among pediatric ophthalmologists in diagnosing plus and pre-plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity.
J AAPOS. 2008 Aug;12(4):352-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.11.022. Epub 2008 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing an objective quantitative method for assessing the severity of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr;263(4):985-992. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06743-7. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
Multimodal Imaging, Tele-Education, and Telemedicine in Retinopathy of Prematurity.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 23;29(1):38-50. doi: 10.4103/meajo.meajo_56_22. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
3
A novel multiple subdivision-based algorithm for quantitative assessment of retinal vascular tortuosity.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2021 Oct;246(20):2222-2229. doi: 10.1177/15353702211032898. Epub 2021 Jul 25.
4
Accuracy and Reliability of Eye-Based vs Quadrant-Based Diagnosis of Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 1;136(6):648-655. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1195.
5
Retinopathy of Prematurity-assist: Novel Software for Detecting Plus Disease.
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;31(6):524-532. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2015.0143. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
7
Comparison of strategies for grading retinal images of premature infants for referral warranted retinopathy of prematurity.
J AAPOS. 2017 Apr;21(2):141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
8
Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Continuous Spectrum of Vascular Abnormality as a Basis of Diagnostic Variability.
Ophthalmology. 2016 Nov;123(11):2338-2344. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
9
Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity: Improving Diagnosis by Ranking Disease Severity and Using Quantitative Image Analysis.
Ophthalmology. 2016 Nov;123(11):2345-2351. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
10
Expert Diagnosis of Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity From Computer-Based Image Analysis.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 1;134(6):651-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0611.

本文引用的文献

1
A pilot study using "ROPtool" to quantify plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity.
J AAPOS. 2007 Aug;11(4):381-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 May 29.
2
Standard image of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Nov;124(11):1669-70. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.11.1669-c.
4
Remote image based retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: a receiver operating characteristic analysis of accuracy.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct;90(10):1292-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.091900. Epub 2006 Apr 13.
5
Accuracy and reliability of remote retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;124(3):322-7. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.3.322.
6
Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity.
Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):572-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2749.
7
Diagnosis of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity using Retinal Image multiScale Analysis.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;46(12):4734-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0646.
8
The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity revisited.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul;123(7):991-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.7.991.
10
Case series of angle-closure glaucoma after laser treatment for retinopathy of prematurity.
J AAPOS. 2005 Feb;9(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.10.007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验