Suppr超能文献

动脉压改变过程中的收缩压变异和脉压变异。

Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure.

作者信息

Kubitz Jens C, Forkl Stefanie, Annecke Thorsten, Kronas Nils, Goetz Alwin E, Reuter Daniel A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2008 Aug;34(8):1520-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1114-8. Epub 2008 Apr 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to investigate the effect of vasopressor therapy on systolic pressure variation (SPV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) compared to experimentally measured left ventricular stroke volume variation (SVV).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective study in a university laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Twelve anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs.

INTERVENTIONS

Increase in mean arterial pressure (by 100%) using phenylephrine and decrease (by 38%) using adenosine.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

SPV and PPV were calculated and compared to SVV derived from aortic blood flow measurements. SPV was significantly affected by changes in arterial pressure [4.6% (1.5) vs. 6.3% (2.1), p < 0.05, increased vs. decreased arterial pressure], whereas PPV did not change during modifications of arterial pressure. During baseline conditions and decreased afterload, correlation with SVV was good both for SPV (r =0.892 and r = 0.859, respectively) and for PPV (r = 0.870 and r = 0.871, respectively) (all p < 0.001). Correlation with SVV was only moderate during increased arterial pressure (r = 0.683 for SPV and r = 0.732 for PPV, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For guiding fluid therapy in patients under vasopressor support, PPV seems superior to SPV.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨血管升压药治疗对收缩压变异(SPV)和脉压变异(PPV)的影响,并与实验测量的左心室每搏量变异(SVV)进行比较。

设计与地点

在大学实验室进行的前瞻性研究。

研究对象

12头麻醉并机械通气的猪。

干预措施

使用去氧肾上腺素使平均动脉压升高(100%),使用腺苷使其降低(38%)。

测量与结果

计算SPV和PPV,并与通过主动脉血流测量得出的SVV进行比较。SPV受动脉压变化的显著影响[动脉压升高时为4.6%(1.5),动脉压降低时为6.3%(2.1),p<0.05],而在动脉压改变期间PPV没有变化。在基线条件和后负荷降低时,SPV(分别为r = 0.892和r = 0.859)和PPV(分别为r = 0.870和r = 0.871)与SVV的相关性均良好(所有p<0.001)。在动脉压升高期间,与SVV的相关性仅为中等(SPV的r = 0.683,PPV的r = 0.732,p<0.05)。

结论

对于在血管升压药支持下的患者指导液体治疗,PPV似乎优于SPV。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验