Kubitz Jens C, Forkl Stefanie, Annecke Thorsten, Kronas Nils, Goetz Alwin E, Reuter Daniel A
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Aug;34(8):1520-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1114-8. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
This study was performed to investigate the effect of vasopressor therapy on systolic pressure variation (SPV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) compared to experimentally measured left ventricular stroke volume variation (SVV).
Prospective study in a university laboratory.
Twelve anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs.
Increase in mean arterial pressure (by 100%) using phenylephrine and decrease (by 38%) using adenosine.
SPV and PPV were calculated and compared to SVV derived from aortic blood flow measurements. SPV was significantly affected by changes in arterial pressure [4.6% (1.5) vs. 6.3% (2.1), p < 0.05, increased vs. decreased arterial pressure], whereas PPV did not change during modifications of arterial pressure. During baseline conditions and decreased afterload, correlation with SVV was good both for SPV (r =0.892 and r = 0.859, respectively) and for PPV (r = 0.870 and r = 0.871, respectively) (all p < 0.001). Correlation with SVV was only moderate during increased arterial pressure (r = 0.683 for SPV and r = 0.732 for PPV, p < 0.05).
For guiding fluid therapy in patients under vasopressor support, PPV seems superior to SPV.
本研究旨在探讨血管升压药治疗对收缩压变异(SPV)和脉压变异(PPV)的影响,并与实验测量的左心室每搏量变异(SVV)进行比较。
在大学实验室进行的前瞻性研究。
12头麻醉并机械通气的猪。
使用去氧肾上腺素使平均动脉压升高(100%),使用腺苷使其降低(38%)。
计算SPV和PPV,并与通过主动脉血流测量得出的SVV进行比较。SPV受动脉压变化的显著影响[动脉压升高时为4.6%(1.5),动脉压降低时为6.3%(2.1),p<0.05],而在动脉压改变期间PPV没有变化。在基线条件和后负荷降低时,SPV(分别为r = 0.892和r = 0.859)和PPV(分别为r = 0.870和r = 0.871)与SVV的相关性均良好(所有p<0.001)。在动脉压升高期间,与SVV的相关性仅为中等(SPV的r = 0.683,PPV的r = 0.732,p<0.05)。
对于在血管升压药支持下的患者指导液体治疗,PPV似乎优于SPV。