Raman R, Dutta A, Day N, Sharma H K, Shaw C J, Johnson G V
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, HU2 3JZ, United Kingdom.
Knee. 2008 Aug;15(4):318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.02.012. Epub 2008 Apr 21.
In this independent prospective randomized trial, we compared the clinical effectiveness, functional outcome and patient satisfaction following intra articular injection with two viscosupplementation agents - Hylan G-F-20 (n=199) and Sodium Hyaluronate (n=193) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. All patients were prospectively reviewed by blinded independent assessors at pre injection, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 months. Knee pain and patient satisfaction were measured on a visual analogue scale. Functional outcome was assessed using WOMAC, Oxford knee score and EuroQol EQ-5D scores. Knee pain on VAS improved from 6.7 to 3.2 by 6 weeks (p=0.02) and was sustained until 12 months (3.7, p=0.04) with Hylan G-F 20. In the Sodium Hyaluronate group, pain improved from 6.6 to 5.7 at 6 weeks (p>0.05) and to 4.1 at 3 months (p=0.04) but was sustained only until 6 months (5.9, p>0.05). Improvement in the WOMAC pain subscale was significantly superior in the Hylan G-F 20 group at 3 months (p=0.02), 6 months (p=0.01) and 12 months (p=0.007). There was no significant difference in the EQ-5D scores at 6 weeks and 3 months between the two groups. The numbers of treatment related adverse events were higher (39 vs. 30) in the Hylan G-F 20 group. One patient in the Hylan G-F 20 group who had a serious adverse event was also included in the final analysis. Although both treatments offered significant pain reduction, it was achieved earlier and sustained for a longer period with Hylan G-F 20. From this study, it appeared that the clinical effectiveness and general patient satisfaction are better amongst patients who received Hylan G-F 20.
在这项独立的前瞻性随机试验中,我们比较了向膝骨关节炎(OA)患者关节腔内注射两种补充关节滑液的药物——海兰G-F-20(n = 199)和透明质酸钠(n = 193)后的临床疗效、功能结局和患者满意度。所有患者在注射前、注射后6周、3个月、6个月、12个月均由独立的盲法评估者进行前瞻性评估。膝关节疼痛和患者满意度采用视觉模拟评分法进行测量。使用WOMAC、牛津膝关节评分和欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol EQ-5D)评分评估功能结局。使用海兰G-F 20治疗时,6周时视觉模拟评分法(VAS)的膝关节疼痛评分从6.7改善至3.2(p = 0.02),并持续至12个月(3.7,p = 0.04)。在透明质酸钠组中,6周时疼痛评分从6.6改善至5.7(p>0.05),3个月时改善至4.1(p = 0.04),但仅持续至6个月(5.9,p>0.05)。在3个月(p = 0.02)、6个月(p = 0.01)和12个月(p = 0.007)时,WOMAC疼痛子量表的改善在海兰G-F 20组中显著更优。两组在6周和3个月时的欧洲五维健康量表评分无显著差异。海兰G-F 20组与治疗相关的不良事件数量更高(39例对30例)。海兰G-F 20组中有1例发生严重不良事件的患者也纳入了最终分析。尽管两种治疗方法均能显著减轻疼痛,但海兰G-F 20能更早实现且持续时间更长。从这项研究来看,接受海兰G-F 20治疗的患者临床疗效和总体患者满意度似乎更高。