Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, 20, Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 07061, South Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 9;13(1):9419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35982-z.
Although the use of intra-articular polynucleotide (IA PN) injection as a viscosupplement for knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment has been proposed, its efficacy and safety compared to high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HMWHA) injection has not yet been established. The present double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of IA PN injection compared to IA HMWHA injection. A total of 60 patients (15 men, 45 women, 64.5 ± 7.5 years) with knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1-4) were randomly allocated to each group. All patients were given three IA injections of PN (n = 30) or HMWHA (n = 30) at intervals of 1 week. The primary endpoint was the change rate in weight-bearing pain (WBP) 16 weeks from the baseline. The secondary endpoint included multiple measurements: the change rate in WBP rate at 8 weeks; the change rate in pain level at rest and during walking at 8 and 16 weeks; the Korean-Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index; the Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimension; Clinical Global Impression, Patient Global Impression at 8 and16 weeks, and total consumption of rescue medicine. The mean change rate in the WBP at 16 weeks from the baseline was - 54.0 ± 38.1% in the IA PN group and - 42.8 (± 35.8%) in the IA HMWHA group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.296). All secondary endpoints related with pain and functional outcome also showed no significant difference between the two groups. Pain at the injection site and swelling were reported as adverse events, and the incidence was similar between the two groups. IA PN showed comparable efficacy and safety to IA HMWHA at 3 times injection with an interval of 1 week. IA PN can be useful alternative to IA HMWHA for the treatment of knee OA.
虽然已经提出将关节内多核苷酸 (IA PN) 注射作为治疗膝骨关节炎 (OA) 的黏弹性补充剂,但与高分子量透明质酸 (HMWHA) 注射相比,其疗效和安全性尚未确定。本双盲、多中心、随机对照试验旨在研究 IA PN 注射与 IA HMWHA 注射相比的疗效和安全性。共有 60 名(15 名男性,45 名女性,64.5 ± 7.5 岁)膝 OA(Kellgren-Lawrence 分级 1-4)患者被随机分配到每组。所有患者均接受 3 次 IA PN(n = 30)或 HMWHA(n = 30)注射,间隔 1 周。主要终点是从基线起 16 周时负重疼痛(WBP)的变化率。次要终点包括多个测量指标:8 周时 WBP 变化率;8 和 16 周时休息和行走时疼痛水平的变化率;韩国-西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数;欧洲生活质量-5 维度;临床总体印象、患者 8 和 16 周时的总体印象以及急救药物的总消耗量。从基线起 16 周时 IA PN 组的 WBP 平均变化率为-54.0 ± 38.1%,IA HMWHA 组为-42.8(±35.8%),两组之间无显著差异(p = 0.296)。与疼痛和功能结果相关的所有次要终点在两组之间也无显著差异。注射部位疼痛和肿胀报告为不良事件,两组的发生率相似。IA PN 在 3 次注射(间隔 1 周)时显示出与 IA HMWHA 相当的疗效和安全性。IA PN 可作为治疗膝骨关节炎的 IA HMWHA 的有用替代药物。