Shapiro Laura R, Solity Jonathan
School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Aston, Birmingham, UK.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2008 Dec;78(Pt 4):597-620. doi: 10.1348/000709908X293850. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
Early, intensive phonological awareness and phonics training is widely held to be beneficial for children with poor phonological awareness. However, most studies have delivered this training separately from children's normal whole-class reading lessons.
We examined whether integrating this training into whole class, mixed-ability reading lessons could impact on children with poor phonological awareness, whilst also benefiting normally developing readers.
Teachers delivered the training within a broad reading programme to whole classes of children from Reception to the end of Year 1 (N=251). A comparison group of children received standard teaching methods (N=213).
Children's literacy was assessed at the beginning of Reception, and then at the end of each year until 1 year post-intervention.
The strategy significantly impacted on reading performance for normally developing readers and those with poor phonological awareness, vastly reducing the incidence of reading difficulties from 20% in comparison schools to 5% in intervention schools.
Phonological and phonics training is highly effective for children with poor phonological awareness, even when incorporated into whole-class teaching.
早期强化语音意识和自然拼读训练被广泛认为对语音意识薄弱的儿童有益。然而,大多数研究都是将这种训练与儿童正常的全班阅读课程分开进行的。
我们研究了将这种训练融入全班混合能力阅读课程是否会对语音意识薄弱的儿童产生影响,同时也使正常发展的阅读者受益。
教师在一个广泛的阅读项目中对从幼儿园小班到一年级末的全班儿童(N = 251)进行了训练。另一组对照儿童接受标准教学方法(N = 213)。
在幼儿园小班开始时对儿童的读写能力进行评估,然后在每年末进行评估,直至干预后1年。
该策略对正常发展的阅读者和语音意识薄弱的儿童的阅读表现有显著影响,将阅读困难的发生率从对照学校的20%大幅降低到干预学校的5%。
语音和自然拼读训练对语音意识薄弱的儿童非常有效,即使融入全班教学也是如此。