Gustafson Stefan, Ferreira Janna, Rönnberg Jerker
Department of Behavioural Sciences & The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Dyslexia. 2007 Aug;13(3):211-29. doi: 10.1002/dys.339.
In a longitudinal intervention study, Swedish reading disabled children in grades 2-3 received either a phonological (n = 41) or an orthographic (n = 39) training program. Both programs were computerized and interventions took place in ordinary school settings with trained special instruction teachers. Two comparison groups, ordinary special instruction and normal readers, were also included in the study. Results showed strong average training effects on text reading and general word decoding for both phonological and orthographic training, but not significantly higher improvements than for the comparison groups. The main research finding was a double dissociation: children with pronounced phonological problems improved their general word decoding skill more from phonological than from orthographic training, whereas the opposite was observed for children with pronounced orthographic problems. Thus, in this population of children, training should focus on children's relative weakness rather than their relative strength in word decoding.
在一项纵向干预研究中,瑞典2至3年级的阅读障碍儿童接受了语音训练项目(n = 41)或正字法训练项目(n = 39)。两个项目均通过计算机进行,干预在普通学校环境中由经过培训的特殊教育教师实施。研究还纳入了两个对照组,即普通特殊教育组和正常阅读者组。结果显示,语音训练和正字法训练对文本阅读和一般单词解码均有显著的平均训练效果,但提升幅度并不显著高于对照组。主要研究发现是一种双重分离现象:语音问题明显的儿童从语音训练中提升一般单词解码技能的程度大于正字法训练,而正字法问题明显的儿童情况则相反。因此,对于这群儿童,训练应聚焦于他们在单词解码方面的相对弱项而非相对强项。