Finlay Dewar D, Nugent Chris D, Donnelly Mark P, Black Norman D
School of Computing and Mathematics, Computer Science Research Institute, University of Ulster, Northern Ireland.
J Electrocardiol. 2008 May-Jun;41(3):264-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.02.009.
A lead selection algorithm was applied to find optimal recording sites for limited lead body surface potential maps. The studied population consisted of a set of 117 lead body surface potential maps recorded from 744 subjects (229, normal; 278, with myocardial infraction [MI]; and 237, with left ventricular hypertrophy [LVH]). One generic lead set derived from all disease groups was found. Also found were 3 disease-specific lead sets (normal, MI, and LVH) and one specific to abnormal subjects (MI and LVH combined). The performance of each lead set in estimating data from other disease groups was largely similar. This was with the exception of leads specific to LVH in the estimation of normal data and normal leads in the estimation of LVH data. Here, the difference was found to be significant (P < .001). The top 6 recording sites in each lead set did not occupy the same positions as the 6 precordial leads. Although disease-specific lead sets are of limited practical use, this study has illustrated that, largely, there is little difference between the performance of different lead sets. The suboptimality of the 6 precordial leads has also been illustrated.
应用一种导联选择算法来为有限导联体表电位图寻找最佳记录部位。研究人群包括从744名受试者记录的117套导联体表电位图(229名正常受试者;278名心肌梗死[MI]患者;237名左心室肥厚[LVH]患者)。发现了一组源自所有疾病组的通用导联集。还发现了3种疾病特异性导联集(正常、MI和LVH)以及一种针对异常受试者(MI和LVH合并)的导联集。每个导联集在估计其他疾病组数据时的表现大致相似。在估计正常数据时LVH特异性导联以及估计LVH数据时正常导联的情况除外。在此,发现差异具有显著性(P <.001)。每个导联集中排名前6的记录部位与6个胸前导联并不占据相同位置。尽管疾病特异性导联集的实际用途有限,但本研究表明,在很大程度上,不同导联集的表现差异不大。同时也说明了6个胸前导联的次优性。