Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者心肌梗死后服用华法林获益较少?

Less benefit from warfarin in diabetics after myocardial infarction?

作者信息

Smith Pål J, Hurlen Mette, Abdelnoor Michael, Arnesen Harald

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Asker and Baerum Hospital, Rud, Norway.

出版信息

Cardiology. 2008;111(3):161-6. doi: 10.1159/000121598. Epub 2008 Apr 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the impact of prognostic factors on the outcome of treatment with warfarin or aspirin after acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Patients from the Warfarin Aspirin Re-Infarction Study, assigned to treatment with warfarin (n = 1,216) or aspirin (n = 1,206) after myocardial infarction, were stratified according to important prognostic factors. Survival from the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction and thromboembolic stroke was estimated within each stratum by odds ratios (OR). The effect of therapy was then tested for heterogeneity across the two groups. Unadjusted analyses were complemented with regression analyses.

RESULTS

In diabetics the OR was 1.54 (95% CI 0.80-2.94) compared to 0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.93) in nondiabetic patients. The latter difference was statistically significant when testing for heterogeneity, suggesting effect modification of warfarin by diabetes. After adjusting for confounders, diabetic patients who received warfarin had a 56% excess risk of an endpoint as compared with those receiving aspirin. By contrast, nondiabetic patients on warfarin had a 22% lower risk of an endpoint than those allocated to aspirin.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data suggest less benefit from warfarin as compared to aspirin in diabetics. The mechanisms behind this remain in question.

摘要

目的

探讨预后因素对急性心肌梗死后使用华法林或阿司匹林治疗结局的影响。

方法

将来自华法林阿司匹林再梗死研究的患者,根据重要预后因素进行分层,这些患者在心肌梗死后被分配接受华法林治疗(n = 1216)或阿司匹林治疗(n = 1206)。通过比值比(OR)估计各层内死亡、心肌梗死和血栓栓塞性卒中复合终点的生存率。然后检验两组间治疗效果的异质性。未调整分析辅以回归分析。

结果

糖尿病患者的OR为1.54(95%可信区间0.80 - 2.94),而非糖尿病患者为0.75(95%可信区间0.60 - 0.93)。在检验异质性时,后一差异具有统计学意义,提示糖尿病对华法林治疗效果有修饰作用。在对混杂因素进行调整后,接受华法林治疗的糖尿病患者发生终点事件的风险比接受阿司匹林治疗的患者高56%。相比之下,接受华法林治疗的非糖尿病患者发生终点事件的风险比分配接受阿司匹林治疗的患者低22%。

结论

目前的数据表明,与阿司匹林相比,糖尿病患者使用华法林的获益较少。其背后的机制仍存在疑问。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验