Gupta Ruta, Paner Gladell P, Amin Mahul B
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Adv Anat Pathol. 2008 May;15(3):127-39. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e31817145a9.
Tumors of the renal pelvis account for approximately 7% to 8% of all renal malignancies, greater than 90% of these are of urothelial (transitional cell) origin. These tumors more typically occur in the sixth to eight decade with a slight male preponderance. Varying risk factors for urothelial carcinomas of the upper tract are recognized including environmental and occupational hazards, chemotherapeutic exposure, and previous history of urinary bladder or ureteral carcinomas. Tumor multifocality is frequent and additional tumors may arise in the ureter, bladder, or on the contralateral side. The histopathologic nuances presented by urothelial carcinoma in this region are generally similar to those in the urinary bladder. Though the World Health Organization 2004/International Society of Urological Pathology system used in the bladder is customarily also employed for grading of urothelial tumors of this region, its prognostic significance at this site is not entirely clear as most tumors are treated with nephroureterectomy irrespective of the grade of the tumor. Histologic grade may be an independent prognostic factor in papillary pT1 tumors; however, most pT2 and higher stage tumors tend to be nonpapillary and of higher grade. Despite advances in treatment modalities with sophisticated endoscopic techniques, tumor stage remains the most important prognostic factor. There are several confounding issues related to staging such as the variable presence and thickness of subepithelial connective tissue and muscularis in the renal calyces, renal pelvis, and the ureter; intratubular pagetoid cancer spread (pTis vs. pT3); and assessing invasion in papillary neoplasms with endophytic or inverted growth. Careful gross examination with adequate sampling and understanding the microanatomy of the pelvicalyceal wall are crucial for accurate stage assignment. Poor fixation of large friable tumors and processing artifacts may compound difficulties in accurate staging. This review focuses on urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract highlighting issues related to its diagnosis, staging, and reporting.
肾盂肿瘤约占所有肾恶性肿瘤的7%至8%,其中90%以上起源于尿路上皮(移行细胞)。这些肿瘤更常见于60至80岁,男性略占优势。已认识到上尿路尿路上皮癌的多种危险因素,包括环境和职业危害、化疗暴露以及既往膀胱癌或输尿管癌病史。肿瘤多灶性很常见,输尿管、膀胱或对侧可能出现额外的肿瘤。该区域尿路上皮癌呈现的组织病理学细微差别通常与膀胱中的相似。尽管膀胱中使用的世界卫生组织2004年/国际泌尿病理学会系统通常也用于该区域尿路上皮肿瘤的分级,但其在此部位的预后意义并不完全清楚,因为大多数肿瘤无论分级如何均采用肾输尿管切除术治疗。组织学分级可能是乳头状pT1肿瘤的独立预后因素;然而,大多数pT2及更高分期的肿瘤往往是非乳头状且分级较高。尽管采用先进的内镜技术使治疗方式有所进步,但肿瘤分期仍然是最重要的预后因素。与分期相关的有几个混杂问题,如肾盏、肾盂和输尿管中上皮下结缔组织和肌层的可变存在和厚度;管内派杰样癌扩散(pTis与pT3);以及评估内生性或倒置生长的乳头状肿瘤的浸润情况。仔细的大体检查并进行充分取材以及了解肾盂壁的微观解剖结构对于准确的分期判定至关重要。大的易碎肿瘤固定不佳和处理假象可能会增加准确分期的难度。本综述重点关注上尿路尿路上皮癌,突出与其诊断、分期和报告相关的问题。