• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上尿路尿路上皮癌:WHO/ISUP 1998共识分类与WHO 1999分类系统的比较

Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: comparison between the WHO/ISUP 1998 consensus classification and WHO 1999 classification system.

作者信息

Holmäng Sten, Johansson Sonny L

机构信息

Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Urology. 2005 Aug;66(2):274-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.011
PMID:16098355
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the usefulness of World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Urological Pathologists 1998 consensus classification with the WHO 1999 classification in a large series of urothelial tumors of the upper urinary tract. Only a few bladder tumor studies have compared these systems.

METHODS

A clinical and histopathologic review was performed of all patients diagnosed in western Sweden between 1971 and 1998 with renal pelvic or ureteral carcinoma. We selected 555 surgically treated patients who all had a urothelial tumor on review of the pathologic findings and no bladder tumor before diagnosis of the upper tract tumor. The median follow-up was 52 months. Disease-specific survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 349 patients had Stage pTa, pT1, or pT2 tumor, with a 5-year disease-specific survival rate of 95%, 80%, and 79%, respectively. No significant difference was found in the prognosis among papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential and low-grade and high-grade tumors of the same stage. Nor was a difference found among papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential and grade 1, 2, and 3 tumors. Of the 349 patients, 171, all with high-grade Stage pT3 tumors, had a 35% disease-specific survival rate. Of these tumors, 38 were grade 2 and 133 were grade 3, with a survival rate of 49% and 25%, respectively (P <0.0037). All 35 pT4 tumors were high grade, and no patient survived past 30 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor stage was a very strong predictor of prognosis in this series of patients treated with open surgery. The tumor grade had little additional prognostic value, although a small advantage was found for the WHO 1999 classification, but only for high-grade, Stage pT3 tumors.

摘要

目的

在一大系列上尿路尿路上皮肿瘤中,比较世界卫生组织(WHO)/国际泌尿病理学会1998年共识分类与WHO 1999年分类的实用性。仅有少数膀胱肿瘤研究对这些分类系统进行过比较。

方法

对1971年至1998年期间在瑞典西部被诊断为肾盂或输尿管癌的所有患者进行临床和组织病理学回顾。我们选择了555例接受手术治疗的患者,这些患者经病理检查均患有尿路上皮肿瘤,且在上尿路肿瘤诊断之前无膀胱肿瘤。中位随访时间为52个月。采用Kaplan-Meier估计法计算疾病特异性生存率。

结果

共有349例患者患有pTa、pT1或pT2期肿瘤,其5年疾病特异性生存率分别为95%、80%和79%。低恶性潜能乳头状尿路上皮肿瘤与相同分期的低级别和高级别肿瘤在预后方面未发现显著差异。低恶性潜能乳头状尿路上皮肿瘤与1级、2级和3级肿瘤之间也未发现差异。在这349例患者中,171例均为高级别pT3期肿瘤,其疾病特异性生存率为35%。在这些肿瘤中,38例为2级,133例为3级,生存率分别为49%和25%(P<0.0037)。所有35例pT4期肿瘤均为高级别,无患者存活超过30个月。

结论

在这一系列接受开放手术治疗的患者中,肿瘤分期是预后的一个非常有力的预测指标。肿瘤分级几乎没有额外的预后价值,尽管发现WHO 1999年分类有一个小优势,但仅适用于高级别pT3期肿瘤。

相似文献

1
Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: comparison between the WHO/ISUP 1998 consensus classification and WHO 1999 classification system.上尿路尿路上皮癌:WHO/ISUP 1998共识分类与WHO 1999分类系统的比较
Urology. 2005 Aug;66(2):274-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.011.
2
Location of the primary tumor is not an independent predictor of cancer specific mortality in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.原发性肿瘤的位置并非上尿路尿路上皮癌患者癌症特异性死亡率的独立预测因素。
J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.035. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
3
Comparison of the WHO/ISUP classification and cytokeratin 20 expression in predicting the behavior of low-grade papillary urothelial tumors. World/Health Organization/Internattional Society of Urologic Pathology.世界卫生组织/国际泌尿病理学会分类与细胞角蛋白20表达在预测低级别乳头状尿路上皮肿瘤行为中的比较
Mod Pathol. 2001 Apr;14(4):267-72. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880300.
4
Comparison of 2004 and 1973 World Health Organization grading systems and their relationship to pathologic staging for predicting long-term prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinoma.比较 2004 年和 1973 年世界卫生组织分级系统及其与病理分期的关系,以预测尿路上皮癌患者的长期预后。
Urology. 2010 Sep;76(3):593-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.032. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
5
Neoplasms of the upper urinary tract: a review with focus on urothelial carcinoma of the pelvicalyceal system and aspects related to its diagnosis and reporting.上尿路肿瘤:一项综述,重点关注肾盂肾盏系统的尿路上皮癌及其诊断和报告相关方面。
Adv Anat Pathol. 2008 May;15(3):127-39. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e31817145a9.
6
Prognostic significance of the 2004 WHO/ISUP classification for prediction of recurrence, progression, and cancer-specific mortality of non-muscle-invasive urothelial tumors of the urinary bladder: a clinicopathologic study of 1,515 cases.2004 年世卫组织/国际泌尿病理学会分类对预测非肌肉浸润性膀胱尿路上皮肿瘤的复发、进展和癌症特异性死亡率的预后意义:1515 例临床病理研究。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2010 May;133(5):788-95. doi: 10.1309/AJCP12MRVVHTCKEJ.
7
[Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Survival and prognostic factors].[上尿路尿路上皮癌。生存情况及预后因素]
Arch Esp Urol. 1998 Apr;51(3):243-51.
8
Lymphovascular invasion and pT stage are prognostic factors in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for localized upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.在接受根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗局限性上尿路上皮细胞癌的患者中,淋巴血管侵犯和 pT 分期是预后因素。
Urology. 2010 Feb;75(2):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1350.
9
[Large series of 114 cases with long-term follow-up of upper urinary tract urothelial tumors].[114例上尿路尿路上皮肿瘤的大样本系列及长期随访]
Actas Urol Esp. 2010 Mar;34(3):232-7.
10
[Classification and prognosis of supravesical urothelioma with the new TNM classification].[采用新TNM分类法对膀胱上尿路上皮瘤的分类与预后]
Urologe A. 1994 May;33(3):247-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Consultation on UTUC II Stockholm 2022: diagnostic and prognostic methods-what's around the corner?2022 年斯德哥尔摩 UTUC II 咨询会:诊断和预后方法——未来的发展方向是什么?
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3405-3411. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04597-4. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
2
Consultation on UTUC II Stockholm 2022: diagnostics, prognostication, and follow-up-where are we today?2022 年斯德哥尔摩 UTUC II 咨询会议:诊断、预后和随访——我们今天在哪里?
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3395-3403. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04530-9. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
3
Synchronous ipsilateral papillary renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma: A case report.
同步性同侧肾乳头状肾细胞癌和尿路上皮癌:一例报告。
Oncol Lett. 2023 Apr 13;25(6):221. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.13807. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Evaluation of Pre-operative Biopsy, Surgical Procedures and Oncologic Outcomes in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC).上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)术前活检、手术程序及肿瘤学结局的评估
Front Surg. 2021 Nov 25;8:790738. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.790738. eCollection 2021.
5
Increased Expression Of SOX2 Predicts A Poor Prognosis And Promotes Malignant Phenotypes In Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.SOX2表达增加预示上尿路尿路上皮癌预后不良并促进恶性表型。
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Oct 24;11:9095-9106. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S219568. eCollection 2019.
6
Consultation on UTUC Stockholm 2018.2018年斯德哥尔摩上尿路上皮癌咨询会
World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2269-2270. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02932-2.
7
Predicting invasiveness and disease-specific survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: identifying relevant clinical tumour characteristics.预测上尿路尿路上皮癌的侵袭性和疾病特异性生存:确定相关的临床肿瘤特征。
World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2335-2342. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02760-4. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
8
Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018 aspects of risk stratification: long-term results and follow-up.2018 年斯德哥尔摩 UTUC 咨询会议:风险分层的长期结果和随访。
World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2289-2296. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02739-1. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
9
Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018 aspects of diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.2018 年斯德哥尔摩上尿路尿路上皮癌咨询会议:上尿路尿路上皮癌的诊断要点。
World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2271-2278. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02732-8. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
10
Volumetric imaging: a potential tool to stage upper tract urothelial carcinoma.容积成像:一种潜在的上尿路尿路上皮癌分期工具。
World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2297-2302. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02682-1. Epub 2019 Feb 28.