Cooke Colin R, Kahn Jeremy M, Caldwell Ellen, Okamoto Valdelis N, Heckbert Susan R, Hudson Leonard D, Rubenfeld Gordon D
Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2008 May;36(5):1412-20. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318170a375.
Studies describing predictors of mortality in patients with acute lung injury were primarily derived from selected academic centers. We sought to determine the predictors of mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with acute lung injury and to characterize the performance of current severity of illness scores in this population.
Secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter, population-based cohort.
Twenty-one hospitals in Washington State.
The cohort included 1,113 patients with acute lung injury identified during the year 1999-2000.
None.
We evaluated physiology, comorbidities, risk factors for acute lung injury, and other variables for their association with death at hospital discharge. Bivariate predictors of death were entered into a multiple logistic regression model. We compared Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, APACHE III, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II to the multivariable model using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The model was validated in an independent cohort of 886 patients with acute lung injury. Modified acute physiology score, age, comorbidities, arterial pH, minute ventilation, PaCO2, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, intensive care unit admission source, and intensive care unit days before onset of acute lung injury were independently predictive of in-hospital death (p < .05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the multivariable model was superior to that of APACHE III (.81 vs. .77, p < .001) but was no different after external validation (.71 vs. .70, p = .64).
The predictors of mortality in patients with acute lung injury are similar to those predictive of mortality in the general intensive care unit population, indicating disease heterogeneity within this cohort. Accordingly, APACHE III predicts mortality in acute lung injury as well as a model using variables selected specifically for patients with acute lung injury.
描述急性肺损伤患者死亡率预测因素的研究主要来自选定的学术中心。我们试图确定基于人群的急性肺损伤患者队列中的死亡率预测因素,并描述当前疾病严重程度评分在该人群中的表现。
对前瞻性、多中心、基于人群的队列进行二次分析。
华盛顿州的21家医院。
该队列包括1999年至2000年期间确诊的1113例急性肺损伤患者。
无。
我们评估了生理学指标、合并症、急性肺损伤的危险因素以及其他与出院时死亡相关的变量。将死亡的二元预测因素纳入多元逻辑回归模型。我们使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积,将急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II、APACHE III和简化急性生理学评分II与多变量模型进行比较。该模型在886例急性肺损伤患者的独立队列中得到验证。修正的急性生理学评分、年龄、合并症、动脉血pH值、分钟通气量、动脉血二氧化碳分压、氧合指数、重症监护病房收治来源以及急性肺损伤发作前的重症监护病房住院天数是住院死亡的独立预测因素(p < 0.05)。多变量模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积优于APACHE III(0.81对0.77,p < 0.001),但外部验证后无差异(0.71对0.70,p = 0.64)。
急性肺损伤患者的死亡率预测因素与一般重症监护病房人群的死亡率预测因素相似,表明该队列中存在疾病异质性。因此,APACHE III在预测急性肺损伤死亡率方面与使用专门为急性肺损伤患者选择的变量构建的模型效果相当。