Teerlinck J, Quirynen M, Darius P, van Steenberghe D
Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991 Spring;6(1):55-61.
Implant mobility as an indicator of failing close bone apposition is generally known. Whereas a clearly visible mobility can always be correlated with an interposition of soft tissue, the range from a clinically firm implant to just tangible implant mobility represents the actual problem zone. Thirty consecutive patients who had mandibles restored with osseointegrated implants ad modum Brånemark were tested with the Periotest device for damping characteristics of the implants and the peri-implant tissues as a whole. The mean Periotest value (PTV) was -1.74. The characteristics of the mandible, the peri-implant tissue, and the abutment length are the determining factors for the PTV. Fixture length, dolder bar, and length of time in function had no significant influence on the PTV.
种植体松动作为骨紧密贴合失败的一个指标是广为人知的。虽然明显可见的松动总是与软组织的介入相关,但从临床上稳固的种植体到刚刚能察觉到的种植体松动范围才是实际的问题区域。连续30例采用Brånemark式骨结合种植体修复下颌骨的患者,使用Periotest装置测试种植体及整个种植体周围组织的阻尼特性。平均Periotest值(PTV)为-1.74。下颌骨的特征、种植体周围组织和基台长度是PTV的决定因素。种植体长度、连接杆和使用时间对PTV没有显著影响。