Suppr超能文献

食管胶囊内镜用于门静脉高压患者食管静脉曲张的筛查和监测。

Esophageal capsule endoscopy for screening and surveillance of esophageal varices in patients with portal hypertension.

作者信息

de Franchis Roberto, Eisen Glenn M, Laine Loren, Fernandez-Urien Inaki, Herrerias Juan Manuel, Brown Russell D, Fisher Laurel, Vargas Hugo E, Vargo John, Thompson Julie, Eliakim Rami

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences, University of Milan, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli and Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2008 May;47(5):1595-603. doi: 10.1002/hep.22227.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Bleeding from esophageal varices (EV) is a serious consequence of portal hypertension. Current guidelines recommend screening patients with cirrhosis with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) to detect varices. However, the unpleasantness and need for sedation of EGD may limit adherence to screening programs. Pilot studies have shown good performance of esophageal capsule endoscopy in detecting varices. This multicenter trial was designed to assess the diagnostic performance of capsule endoscopy in comparison with EGD. Patients undergoing EGD for screening or surveillance of EV underwent a capsule study previously. The study was designed as an equivalence study, assuming that a difference of <or=10% between capsule endoscopy and EGD in diagnosing EV would demonstrate equivalence. Two hundred eighty-eight patients were enrolled. Endoscopy was for screening in 195 patients and for surveillance of known EV in 93. Overall agreement for detecting EV between EGD and capsule endoscopy was 85.8%; the kappa score was 0.73. Capsule endoscopy had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 84%, 88%, 92%, and 77%, respectively. The difference in diagnosing EV was 15.6% in favor of EGD. There was complete agreement on variceal grade in 227 of 288 cases (79%). In differentiating between medium/large varices requiring treatment and small/absent varices requiring surveillance, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for capsule endoscopy were 78%, 96%, 87%, and 92%, respectively. Overall agreement on treatment decisions based on EV size was substantial at 91% (kappa = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

We recommend that EGD be used to screen patients with cirrhosis for large EV. However, the minimal invasiveness, good tolerance, and good agreement of capsule endoscopy with EGD might increase adherence to screening programs. Whether this is the case needs to be determined.

摘要

未标注

食管静脉曲张(EV)出血是门静脉高压的严重后果。当前指南建议对肝硬化患者进行食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)以检测静脉曲张。然而,EGD带来的不适感以及需要镇静可能会限制对筛查项目的依从性。初步研究表明食管胶囊内镜在检测静脉曲张方面表现良好。本多中心试验旨在评估胶囊内镜与EGD相比的诊断性能。因筛查或监测EV而接受EGD检查的患者此前已进行过胶囊内镜检查。该研究设计为等效性研究,假设胶囊内镜与EGD在诊断EV方面的差异≤10%即表明等效。共纳入288例患者。其中195例患者进行EGD检查是为了筛查,93例是为了监测已知的EV。EGD与胶囊内镜在检测EV方面的总体一致性为85.8%;kappa值为0.73。胶囊内镜的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为84%、88%、92%和77%。在诊断EV方面,EGD的优势为15.6%。288例病例中有227例(79%)在静脉曲张分级上完全一致。在区分需要治疗的中/大静脉曲张和需要监测的小/无静脉曲张时,胶囊内镜的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为78%、96%、87%和92%。基于EV大小做出的治疗决策总体一致性较高,为91%(kappa = 0.77)。

结论

我们建议使用EGD对肝硬化患者进行大EV筛查。然而,胶囊内镜的微创性、良好耐受性以及与EGD的良好一致性可能会提高对筛查项目的依从性。是否如此尚需确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验