Wilms Christian, Mueller Lars, Lenk Christian, Wittkugel Oliver, Helmke Knut, Krupski-Berdien Gerrit, Rogiers Xavier, Broering Dieter C
Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Ann Surg. 2008 May;247(5):825-34. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816a9d7c.
The extent of hepatectomies is limited by the functional reserve of the remnant liver. The introduction of preoperative portal vein occlusion techniques to induce a preoperative hyperplasia of the future liver remnant has reduced the risk of postoperative liver failure. However, it has remained a matter of debate whether partial portal vein embolization (PVE) or suture ligation of the portal branches during exploration is the preferred technique. We compared both techniques under standardized experimental conditions in a large animal model by means of effectiveness and pathophysiologic differences.
Thirteen mini-pigs underwent portal vein ligation (PVL), 11 mini-pigs underwent PVE of 75% of the liver volume, and 6 underwent a sham operation. The animals were killed after 28 days. Laboratory liver function and damage parameters, lobar liver-to-body weight indices, portal and arterial flow alterations, and histologic changes were assessed. Ex situ arteriograms and portograms were performed to examine adaptive changes in the macroarchitecture of both vascular systems.
The liver-to-body weight index of the nonoccluded lobe was highest after PVE (0.85) versus 0.6 (P < 0.05) after PVL. There was no significant reduction in global serum parameters reflecting total liver function. After 4 weeks, the PVL group consistently exhibited hepatopetal portal flow in the ligated lobes, which was present but significantly decreased after PVE. The ex situ angiography after PVE and PVL revealed the development of portal neocollaterals in the portal-occluded liver parts.
Both PVL and PVE are able to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. In comparison, PVE is the more effective technique to increase the future liver remnant. This is due to a more effective, durable occlusion of the portal branches. Formation of collaterals between occluded and nonoccluded liver parts seems to be the cause of inferior regeneration in the ligation group.
肝切除术的范围受残余肝脏功能储备的限制。术前门静脉阻断技术的引入可诱导未来肝残余组织的术前增生,从而降低了术后肝衰竭的风险。然而,部分门静脉栓塞术(PVE)或术中门静脉分支缝扎术哪种是首选技术仍存在争议。我们通过有效性和病理生理学差异,在大型动物模型的标准化实验条件下比较了这两种技术。
13只小型猪接受门静脉结扎术(PVL),11只小型猪接受占肝脏体积75%的PVE,6只接受假手术。28天后处死动物。评估实验室肝功能和损伤参数、肝叶与体重指数、门静脉和动脉血流改变以及组织学变化。进行体外动脉造影和门静脉造影以检查两个血管系统宏观结构的适应性变化。
PVE后未结扎肝叶的肝与体重指数最高(0.85),而PVL后为0.6(P<0.05)。反映肝脏整体功能的总体血清参数无显著降低。4周后,PVL组结扎肝叶持续出现向肝门静脉血流,PVE后虽有但显著减少。PVE和PVL后的体外血管造影显示门静脉阻塞肝脏部分出现门静脉新侧支。
PVL和PVE均能诱导未来肝残余组织肥大。相比之下,PVE是增加未来肝残余组织更有效的技术。这是由于门静脉分支的阻断更有效、更持久。阻塞与未阻塞肝脏部分之间侧支的形成似乎是结扎组再生较差的原因。