Pittaluga Paul, Chastanet Sylvain, Guex Jean-Jérôme
Riviera Veine Institut, Nice, France.
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;47(6):1300-4; discussion 1304-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.042. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
Radiofrequency and laser vein treatment, which entail preservation of the saphenous confluence, have called into question the dogma of ligation of all tributaries at the sapheno-femoral confluence (SFC), so called "crossectomy". Nevertheless, crossectomy is still done when saphenous vein stripping is chosen for varicose vein treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate results after stripping procedures in which the SFC was preserved.
This was a retrospective cohort study for which limbs treated for varicose veins by surgical stripping of the great saphenous vein and preservation of the SFC were studied. All limbs had a preoperative duplex examination and showed SFC and truncal incompetence of the great saphenous vein. Periodic postoperative standing duplex ultrasound and clinical examinations were carried out, and results were recorded and analyzed retrospectively.
A total of 195 lower limbs were operated on in 151 patients (128 women and 25 men) aged from 22 to 88 years (mean age 56.8). The preoperative diameter of the SFC ranged from 4.7 to 17 mm (mean 9.5 mm). The preoperative CEAP class distribution was C1 1.5%, C2 82.1%, C3 6.7%, and C4-C6 9.7%. Preoperative symptoms were present in 61.8% of cases. Postoperative thrombosis of the SFC was observed in one case with an extension to the deep femoral vein and pulmonary embolization at 1 month. Recovery was complete. At a mean of 24.4 months postoperatively (median 27.3 months, range 8 to 34.8), persistent SFC reflux was observed in only two cases (1.8%) and a SFC neovascularization in one case (0.9%). Recurrence of varicose veins appeared in seven cases (6.3%) but in conjunction with SFC reflux in only one case. Post treatment 83.9% of limbs were converted to CEAP clinical class 0 to 1 and significant symptom improvement was observed in 91.3% of cases with an aesthetic benefit in 95.5%.
Preservation of the SFC during saphenous stripping gave good results with regard to hemodynamics and neovascularization on the SFC, varicose vein recurrence, improvement of symptoms, and aesthetic appearance for legs with a median follow-up of 27.3 months.
射频和激光静脉治疗需要保留大隐静脉汇合处,这对在大隐静脉-股静脉汇合处(SFC)结扎所有属支的教条,即所谓的“交叉结扎术”提出了质疑。然而,当选择大隐静脉剥脱术治疗静脉曲张时,交叉结扎术仍在进行。本研究的目的是评估保留SFC的剥脱术后的结果。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为通过大隐静脉手术剥脱并保留SFC治疗静脉曲张的肢体。所有肢体术前均进行了双功超声检查,显示SFC和大隐静脉主干功能不全。术后定期进行站立位双功超声检查和临床检查,并对结果进行回顾性记录和分析。
151例患者(128例女性和25例男性)共195条下肢接受了手术,年龄在22至88岁之间(平均年龄56.8岁)。术前SFC直径为4.7至17mm(平均9.5mm)。术前CEAP分级分布为:C1级1.5%,C2级82.1%,C3级6.7%,C4 - C6级9.7%。61.8%的病例术前有症状。1例患者术后1个月观察到SFC血栓形成并延伸至股深静脉和肺栓塞,恢复完全。术后平均24.4个月(中位数27.3个月,范围8至34.8个月),仅2例(1.8%)观察到持续性SFC反流,1例(0.9%)观察到SFC新生血管形成。7例(6.3%)出现静脉曲张复发,但仅1例与SFC反流有关。治疗后83.9%的肢体转变为CEAP临床0至1级,91.3%的病例症状有显著改善,95.5%的病例有美学改善。
在大隐静脉剥脱术中保留SFC,在中位随访27.3个月时,在SFC的血流动力学和新生血管形成、静脉曲张复发、症状改善以及腿部美学外观方面均取得了良好的效果。