Suppr超能文献

在资源有限环境下仅通过病毒载量、CD4 细胞计数或临床观察来监测接受抗逆转录病毒治疗患者的结果:一个计算机模拟模型

Outcomes from monitoring of patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings with viral load, CD4 cell count, or clinical observation alone: a computer simulation model.

作者信息

Phillips Andrew N, Pillay Deenan, Miners Alec H, Bennett Diane E, Gilks Charles F, Lundgren Jens D

机构信息

HIV Epidemiology and Biostatistics Group, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, and Royal Free Centre for HIV Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2008 Apr 26;371(9622):1443-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60624-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In lower-income countries, WHO recommends a population-based approach to antiretroviral treatment with standardised regimens and clinical decision making based on clinical status and, where available CD4 cell count, rather than viral load. Our aim was to study the potential consequences of such monitoring strategies, especially in terms of survival and resistance development.

METHODS

A validated computer simulation model of HIV infection and the effect of antiretroviral therapy was used to compare survival, use of second-line regimens, and development of resistance that result from different strategies-based on viral load, CD4 cell count, or clinical observation alone-for determining when to switch people starting antiretroviral treatment with the WHO-recommended first-line regimen of stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine to second-line antiretroviral treatment.

FINDINGS

Over 5 years, the predicted proportion of potential life-years survived was 83% with viral load monitoring (switch when viral load >500 copies per mL), 82% with CD4 cell count monitoring (switch at 50% drop from peak), and 82% with clinical monitoring (switch when two new WHO stage 3 events or a WHO stage 4 event occur). Corresponding values over 20 years were 67%, 64%, and 64%. Findings were robust to variations in model specification in extensive univariable and multivariable sensitivity analyses. Although survival was slightly longer with viral load monitoring, this strategy was not the most cost effective.

INTERPRETATION

For patients on the first-line regimen of stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine the benefits of viral load or CD4 cell count monitoring over clinical monitoring alone are modest. Development of cheap and robust versions of these assays is important, but widening access to antiretrovirals-with or without laboratory monitoring-is currently the highest priority.

摘要

背景

在低收入国家,世界卫生组织建议采用基于人群的抗逆转录病毒治疗方法,使用标准化治疗方案,并根据临床状况以及(若有条件)CD4细胞计数而非病毒载量进行临床决策。我们的目的是研究此类监测策略的潜在后果,尤其是在生存和耐药性发展方面。

方法

使用经过验证的HIV感染计算机模拟模型以及抗逆转录病毒治疗的效果,比较基于病毒载量、CD4细胞计数或仅临床观察的不同策略(用于确定何时将开始使用世界卫生组织推荐的司他夫定、拉米夫定和奈韦拉平一线治疗方案的患者转换为二线抗逆转录病毒治疗)所导致的生存情况、二线治疗方案的使用以及耐药性的发展。

结果

在5年期间,病毒载量监测(病毒载量>500拷贝/mL时转换)预测的潜在生存生命年比例为83%,CD4细胞计数监测(从峰值下降50%时转换)为82%,临床监测(出现两个新的世界卫生组织3期事件或一个世界卫生组织4期事件时转换)为82%。20年期间的相应数值分别为67%、64%和64%。在广泛的单变量和多变量敏感性分析中,研究结果对模型规格的变化具有稳健性。尽管病毒载量监测的生存期略长,但该策略并非最具成本效益。

解读

对于接受司他夫定、拉米夫定和奈韦拉平一线治疗方案的患者,仅进行病毒载量或CD4细胞计数监测相较于仅临床监测的益处不大。开发这些检测方法的廉价且可靠版本很重要,但目前扩大抗逆转录病毒药物的可及性(无论有无实验室监测)是最优先事项。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验