Davidson Larry, Ridgway Priscilla, Kidd Sean, Topor Alain, Borg Marit
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine and Institution for Social and Policy Studies, New Haven, CT 06513, USA.
Can J Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;53(3):137-44. doi: 10.1177/070674370805300303.
This article offers examples of the ways in which qualitative methods have informed, and may inform, mental health policy in Canada and beyond. Three initial uses of these methods are identified: to generate hypotheses to be tested by other means; to explore the subjective experiences and everyday lives of people with mental illnesses; and to investigate processes of recovery and the active role of the individual in recovery. Given the recent focus in mental health policy in Canada, the United States, and around the world on transforming mental health systems to promote recovery and the emphasis recovery places on the individual's own first-hand perspective, we argue that qualitative methods will become increasingly useful as psychiatry shifts away from symptom reduction to enabling people to live satisfying, hopeful, and meaningful lives in the community.
本文提供了一些例子,说明定性方法在为加拿大及其他地区的心理健康政策提供信息方面,以及可能提供信息方面所采用的方式。确定了这些方法的三种初步用途:生成有待通过其他方式检验的假设;探索精神疾病患者的主观体验和日常生活;调查康复过程以及个体在康复中的积极作用。鉴于加拿大、美国及全球近期心理健康政策关注转变心理健康系统以促进康复,以及康复对个人自身第一手观点的重视,我们认为,随着精神病学从减少症状转向使人们能够在社区中过上满意、充满希望和有意义的生活,定性方法将变得越来越有用。