Leslie William D, Tsang James F, Lix Lisa M
Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
J Bone Miner Res. 2008 Sep;23(9):1468-76. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080416.
DXA is affected by skeletal size, with smaller bones giving lower areal BMD despite equal material density. Whether this size effect confounds the use of BMD as a diagnostic and fracture risk assessment tool is unclear. We identified 16,205 women of white ethnicity >or=50 yr of age undergoing baseline hip assessment with DXA (1998-2002) from a population-based database that contains all clinical DXA test results for the Province of Manitoba, Canada. Total hip measurements were categorized according to quartile in total hip bone area (Q1 = smallest, Q4 = largest). Longitudinal health service records were assessed for the presence of nontraumatic osteoporotic fracture codes during a mean of 3.2 yr of follow-up after BMD testing (757 osteoporotic fractures, 186 hip fractures). Total hip bone area strongly affected osteoporosis diagnosis with much higher rates in Q1 (14.4%) than Q4 (8.9%). However, incident fracture rates were constant across all area quartiles, and prevalent fractures were paradoxically fewer in smaller area quartiles (p < 0.001 for trend). Age was a potential confounder that correlated positively with area (r = 0.12, p < 0.0001). When age was not included in a Cox regression model, Q1 seemed to have a lower rate of incident osteoporotic fractures (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66-0.98, reference Q4) and hip fractures (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.43-0.94) for a given level of BMD. In age-adjusted regression models, total hip BMD was strongly predictive of incident osteoporotic fractures (HR per SD = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.68-1.99) and hip fractures (HR per SD = 2.80, 95% CI = 2.33-3.35), but there was no independent effect of bone area (categorical or continuous). Nested matched subgroup analysis and ROC analysis confirmed that bone area had no appreciable effect on incident fractures. We conclude that total hip areal BMD categorizes a substantially higher fraction of women with smaller bone area as being osteoporotic despite younger age. Incident fracture rates correlate equally well with BMD across all bone area quartiles when adjusted for age.
双能X线吸收法(DXA)受骨骼大小影响,即使骨材料密度相同,较小的骨骼其骨面积密度(BMD)也较低。这种大小效应是否会混淆BMD作为诊断和骨折风险评估工具的应用尚不清楚。我们从一个包含加拿大曼尼托巴省所有临床DXA检测结果的人群数据库中,识别出16205名年龄≥50岁的白人女性,她们在1998 - 2002年期间接受了DXA基线髋关节评估。根据全髋关节骨面积的四分位数对全髋关节测量结果进行分类(Q1 = 最小,Q4 = 最大)。在BMD检测后的平均3.2年随访期间,评估纵向健康服务记录中有无非创伤性骨质疏松性骨折编码(757例骨质疏松性骨折,186例髋部骨折)。全髋关节骨面积对骨质疏松诊断有强烈影响,Q1组(14.4%)的诊断率远高于Q4组(8.9%)。然而,所有面积四分位数组的骨折发生率是恒定的,且较小面积四分位数组的现患骨折反而更少(趋势p < 0.001)。年龄是一个潜在的混杂因素,与面积呈正相关(r = 0.12,p < 0.0001)。当Cox回归模型中不纳入年龄时,对于给定的BMD水平,Q1组的骨质疏松性骨折发生率(HR = 0.80,95% CI = 0.66 - 0.98,参考Q4组)和髋部骨折发生率(HR = 0.63,95% CI = 0.43 - 0.94)似乎较低。在年龄调整回归模型中,全髋关节BMD对骨质疏松性骨折发生率(每标准差HR = 1.83,95% CI = 1.68 - 1.99)和髋部骨折发生率(每标准差HR = 2.80,95% CI = 2.33 - 3.35)有很强的预测性,但骨面积(分类或连续变量)没有独立影响。嵌套匹配亚组分析和ROC分析证实骨面积对骨折发生率没有明显影响。我们得出结论,尽管年龄较轻,但全髋关节面积BMD将骨面积较小的女性中很大一部分归类为骨质疏松。在调整年龄后,所有骨面积四分位数组的骨折发生率与BMD的相关性相同。