De Robertis Fabio, Rogers Paula, Amrani Mohammed, Petrou Mario, Pepper John R, Bahrami Toufan, Dreyfus Gilles D, Khaghani Asghar, Birks Emma J
Department of Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 May;27(5):474-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.01.027.
Ventricular assist devices are effective in severe end-stage cardiac failure but outcomes remain poor in critically ill patients. Cheaper and less invasive short-term devices have been used in this setting. We report our experience with the Levitronix CentriMag short-term ventricular assist device as a potential bridge prior to deciding whether a more expensive device should be used or whether transplantation should be undertaken.
Since August 2003, 16 moribund patients (14 males; age 32.7 +/- 14.9 [range 16 to 62] years) have been supported with the CentriMag device as a "bridge to decision." Twelve patients had an intra-aortic balloon pump pre-operatively, 13 had multi-organ failure, 11 had septic shock, and in 5 patients the neurologic status was uncertain at the time of insertion of the device.
Operative mortality was 18.7% (3 patients). Seven patients (43.7%) were reoperated for bleeding. The mean support duration was 46.9 +/- 32.3 (range 6 to 111) days. There were 2 late deaths during Levitronix utilization. Follow-up was 12.8 +/- 12.5 (range 0.6 to 43) months. Eleven patients (68.7%) are currently alive and well: 2 patients recovered and had the Levitronix device explanted; 6 patients were upgraded to a long-term device; and 3 patients were bridged directly to transplantation. The actuarial survival at 1, 6 and 12 months was 85.7%, 64.9% and 64.9%, respectively. There were no instances of device failure.
The Levitronix device is effective in rescuing critically ill "moribund" patients and can provide an opportunity for low-cost support and optimization of their condition prior to deciding whether a more expensive device should be placed or if transplantation should be undertaken. Better candidate selection for further procedures can then be allowed.
心室辅助装置对严重终末期心力衰竭有效,但危重症患者的治疗效果仍然较差。在此情况下,已使用了更便宜且侵入性较小的短期装置。我们报告了使用Levitronix CentriMag短期心室辅助装置作为潜在桥梁的经验,以便在决定是否应使用更昂贵的装置或是否应进行移植之前进行评估。
自2003年8月以来,16例濒死患者(14例男性;年龄32.7±14.9[范围16至62]岁)接受了CentriMag装置作为“决策桥梁”的支持。12例患者术前使用了主动脉内球囊泵,13例有多器官功能衰竭,11例有感染性休克,5例在装置植入时神经状态不明。
手术死亡率为18.7%(3例患者)。7例患者(43.7%)因出血再次手术。平均支持时间为46.9±32.3(范围6至111)天。在使用Levitronix期间有2例晚期死亡。随访时间为12.8±12.5(范围0.6至43)个月。11例患者(68.7%)目前存活且状况良好:2例患者康复并取出了Levitronix装置;6例患者升级为长期装置;3例患者直接过渡到移植。1、6和12个月时的精算生存率分别为85.7%、64.9%和64.9%。没有装置故障的情况。
Levitronix装置在挽救危重症“濒死”患者方面有效,并且可以在决定是否应放置更昂贵的装置或是否应进行移植之前,为低成本支持和病情优化提供机会。这样就可以更好地选择进一步治疗的候选者。