Yue Stephanie, Duncan Ian J H, Moccia Richard D
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Canada.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2008;11(1):14-27. doi: 10.1080/10888700701729106.
Trout learned the operant task of pendulum-pressing for a food-reward in a mean of 4.3 sessions lasting 1 hr. In a separate phase, fish also learned--through classical conditioning--to associate a neutral light cue with an aversive stimulus. When again allowed to pendulum-press for food, after aversive classical conditioning, there was a drop in the rate of responding. The mean rate dropped from 3.6-2.9 responses per min. Most important, when the light-stimulus was superimposed on a steady bout of pendulum-pressing, trout ceased to press the pendulum and did not resume activity until termination of the light-stimulus (mean number of responses during a 3-min interval immediately prior to light-stimulus = 14.3 vs. during 3-min light-stimulus = 0.1). Psychologists have used this decrease in operant responding, or "conditioned emotional response," as a tool to examine the psychological nature of this type of aversive conditioning. In this study, the fish demonstrated various results under this paradigm similar to those shown by "higher" nonhuman animals, therefore challenging the view of fish as unconscious, nonsentient animals.
鳟鱼学会了通过按压钟摆以获取食物奖励的操作性任务,平均用时4.3个课时,每个课时持续1小时。在另一个阶段,鱼类还通过经典条件作用学会了将中性光信号与厌恶刺激联系起来。在经历厌恶经典条件作用后,当再次允许鳟鱼按压钟摆获取食物时,反应速率下降。平均速率从每分钟3.6次降至2.9次。最重要的是,当光刺激叠加在持续稳定的钟摆按压过程中时,鳟鱼会停止按压钟摆,并且在光刺激结束之前不会恢复活动(在光刺激前3分钟内的平均反应次数 = 14.3次,而在3分钟光刺激期间 = 0.1次)。心理学家已将这种操作性反应的减少,即“条件性情绪反应”,用作一种工具来研究此类厌恶条件作用的心理本质。在本研究中,鱼类在该范式下展现出与“高等”非人类动物类似的各种结果,因此对鱼类是无意识、无感知动物的观点提出了挑战。