Silverman Wendy K, Ortiz Claudio D, Viswesvaran Chockalingham, Burns Barbara J, Kolko David J, Putnam Frank W, Amaya-Jackson Lisa
Department of Psychology, Child and Family Psychosocial Research Center, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008 Jan;37(1):156-83. doi: 10.1080/15374410701818293.
The article reviews the current status (1993-2007) of psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents who have been exposed to traumatic events. Twenty-one treatment studies are evaluated using criteria from Nathan and Gorman (2002) along a continuum of methodological rigor ranging from Type 1 to Type 6. All studies were, at a minimum, robust or fairly rigorous. The treatments in each of these 21 studies also are classified using criteria from Chambless et al. (1996), and Chambless and Hollon (1998). Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy met the well-established criteria; School-Based Group Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment met the criteria for probably efficacious. All the other treatments were classified as either possibly efficacious or experimental. Meta-analytic results for four outcomes (i.e., posttraumatic stress, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and externalizing behavior problems) across all treatments compared to waitlist control and active control conditions combined reveal that, on average, treatments had positive, though modest, effects for all four outcomes. We also cover investigative work on predictors, moderators, and mediators of treatment outcome, as well as the clinical representativeness and generalizability of the studies. The article concludes with a discussion of practice guidelines and future research directions.
本文回顾了1993年至2007年期间针对遭受创伤性事件的儿童和青少年的心理社会治疗的现状。使用内森和戈尔曼(2002年)的标准,沿着从1型到6型的方法严谨性连续体对21项治疗研究进行了评估。所有研究至少都具有较强或相当严谨的程度。这21项研究中的每一项治疗方法也使用钱布利斯等人(1996年)以及钱布利斯和霍伦(1998年)的标准进行了分类。创伤聚焦认知行为疗法符合既定标准;基于学校的团体认知行为疗法符合可能有效的标准。所有其他治疗方法被归类为可能有效或实验性的。与等待名单控制组和积极控制组条件相结合相比,所有治疗方法在四个结果(即创伤后应激、抑郁症状、焦虑症状和外化行为问题)上的元分析结果表明,平均而言,治疗方法对所有四个结果都有积极但适度的影响。我们还涵盖了关于治疗结果的预测因素、调节因素和中介因素的调查工作,以及研究的临床代表性和普遍性。本文最后讨论了实践指南和未来的研究方向。