Norton Peter J, Price Esther C
Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5022, USA.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007 Jun;195(6):521-31. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000253843.70149.9a.
The efficacy of cognitive behavioral treatments (CBT) for anxiety in adults has been supported by multiple meta-analyses. However, most have focused on only 1 diagnosis, thereby disallowing diagnostic comparisons. This study examined the efficacy of CBT across the anxiety disorders. One hundred eight trials of CBT for an anxiety disorder met study criteria. Cognitive therapy and exposure therapy alone, in combination, or combined with relaxation training, were efficacious across the anxiety disorders, with no differential efficacy for any treatment components for any specific diagnoses. However, when comparing across diagnoses, outcomes for generalized anxiety disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder were superior to those for social anxiety disorder, but no other differences emerged. CBT effects were superior to those for no-treatment and expectancy control treatments, although tentative evidence suggested equal effects of CBT when compared with relaxation-only treatments.
多项荟萃分析证实了认知行为疗法(CBT)对成人焦虑症的疗效。然而,大多数研究仅聚焦于一种诊断,因而无法进行诊断间的比较。本研究考察了CBT对各类焦虑症的疗效。符合研究标准的有108项针对焦虑症的CBT试验。单独的认知疗法、暴露疗法,或二者结合,或与放松训练相结合,对各类焦虑症均有效,且对于任何特定诊断,任何治疗成分均无差异疗效。然而,在不同诊断之间进行比较时,广泛性焦虑症和创伤后应激障碍的治疗效果优于社交焦虑症,但未发现其他差异。CBT的效果优于无治疗和预期控制治疗,不过初步证据表明,与仅进行放松治疗相比,CBT的效果相当。