Ito O, Okamoto M, Murakami Y, Nakayama R
Division of Internal Medicine, Aichi Prefectural Owari Hospital, Ichinomiya.
J Cardiol. 1991;21(4):931-41.
We examined the relationship of hypertension to left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and left ventricular diastolic function by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device and echocardiography. We studied 36 untreated hypertensive non-diabetic patients (16 males and 20 females) whose casual systolic blood pressure (CSBP) and/or diastolic blood pressure (CDBP) were higher than 140 mmHg and 90 mmHg, respectively. All patients were less than 65 years of age without organic heart disease. Resting systolic and diastolic blood pressures (RSBP, RDBP) were measured after lying in a supine position for 30 min by the auscultatory method. Ambulatory blood pressure was measured every 30 or 60 min for 24 hours by Colin ABPM 630, and the mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressures (ASBP, ADBP) and the systolic and diastolic hyperbaric indices (SHI, DHI) were obtained. The left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was obtained as an indicator of LVH by M-mode echocardiography. The ratio of peak velocity of mitral inflow caused by atrial contraction to that of rapid inflow (A/R) was obtained as an indicator of the LV diastolic function by Doppler echocardiography. The coefficients of correlation between BP and the LVMI, and the A/R were determined. There were significant positive correlations between the LVMI and ASBP (r = 0.51, p < 0.005), the SHI (r = 0.49, p < 0.005), CSBP (r = 0.47, p < 0.01) and RSBP (r = 0.41, p < 0.05), however, there were no significant correlations between the LVMI and ADBP, the DHI, CDBP, RDBP and age. There were significant positive correlations between the A/R and ADBP (r = 0.44, p < 0.01), age (r = 0.40, p < 0.02), CSBP (r = 0.38, p < 0.05) and RDBP (r = 0.38, p < 0.05), however, no significant correlations between the A/R and ASBP, the SHI, DHI, RSBP and CDBP. Only a weak correlation was observed in all subjects between the LVMI and A/R, which was slightly improved by use of > 90 mmHg CSBP readings (r = 0.32). It was concluded that LVH is related mainly to continuous systolic hypertension, and that LV diastolic dysfunction is related mainly to continuous diastolic hypertension. Therefore, it was suggested that LVH and LV diastolic dysfunction in hypertensive patients are caused by different mechanisms.
我们通过动态血压监测装置和超声心动图检查了高血压与左心室肥厚(LVH)及左心室舒张功能之间的关系。我们研究了36例未经治疗的高血压非糖尿病患者(16例男性和20例女性),其偶测收缩压(CSBP)和/或舒张压(CDBP)分别高于140 mmHg和90 mmHg。所有患者年龄均小于65岁,无器质性心脏病。通过听诊法在仰卧位躺30分钟后测量静息收缩压和舒张压(RSBP、RDBP)。使用Colin ABPM 630每30或60分钟测量一次动态血压,持续24小时,得出24小时动态平均收缩压和舒张压(ASBP、ADBP)以及收缩压和舒张压高压指数(SHI、DHI)。通过M型超声心动图获得左心室质量指数(LVMI)作为LVH的指标。通过多普勒超声心动图获得心房收缩引起的二尖瓣流入峰值速度与快速流入峰值速度之比(A/R)作为左心室舒张功能的指标。确定血压与LVMI以及A/R之间的相关系数。LVMI与ASBP(r = 0.51,p < 0.005)、SHI(r = 0.49,p < 0.005)、CSBP(r = 0.47,p < 0.01)和RSBP(r = 0.41,p < 0.05)之间存在显著正相关,然而,LVMI与ADBP、DHI、CDBP、RDBP和年龄之间无显著相关性。A/R与ADBP(r = 0.44,p < 0.01)、年龄(r = 0.40,p < 0.02)、CSBP(r = 0.38,p < 0.05)和RDBP(r = 0.38,p < 0.05)之间存在显著正相关,然而,A/R与ASBP、SHI、DHI、RSBP和CDBP之间无显著相关性。在所有受试者中,LVMI与A/R之间仅观察到微弱的相关性,使用> 90 mmHg的CSBP读数后相关性略有改善(r = 0.32)。得出的结论是,LVH主要与持续性收缩期高血压有关,而左心室舒张功能障碍主要与持续性舒张期高血压有关。因此,提示高血压患者的LVH和左心室舒张功能障碍是由不同机制引起的。