Plata-Munoz Juan J, Muthusamy Anand, Quiroga Isabel, Contractor Harold H, Sinha Sanjay, Vaidya Anil, Darby Christopher, Fuggle Susan V, Friend Peter J
Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford Transplant Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Transpl Int. 2008 Sep;21(9):899-907. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2008.00685.x. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
Pulsatile perfusion (PP) might be a cost-effective cold preservation technique to reduce the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) in kidneys from deceased donors. With the aim to address whether PP can reduce the incidence of DGF in kidneys from controlled donors after cardiac death (cDCD), we compared the clinical outcome of 30 recipients of kidneys from cDCD preserved by static cold storage (cDCD-SCS) with 30 recipients of cDCD kidneys preserved by PP (cDCD-PP). The end-points were the incidence of primary nonfunction (PNF), DGF and acute rejection (AR), the length of hospitalization, 1, 3, 6 and 12-months graft function, graft survival and patient survival. Donor, recipient and preimplantation data were well matched. DGF was significantly lower (53.3% vs. 86.6% P<0.001) and the length of hospitalization shorter (10 vs. 14 days P<0.033) in the cDCD-PP group. Similarly, postoperative and short-term graft function (7 and 30 days and 6 and 12 months, respectively) was statistically better in the cDCD-PP than in the cDCD-SCS. In summary, in this cohort, clinical introduction of PP was associated with a significant reduction of DGF, shorter hospitalization and better graft function than SCS.
搏动灌注(PP)可能是一种经济有效的肾脏冷保存技术,可降低已故供者肾脏延迟移植功能(DGF)的发生率。为了探讨PP是否能降低心脏死亡后可控供者(cDCD)肾脏DGF的发生率,我们比较了30例接受静态冷保存(cDCD-SCS)的cDCD供肾受者与30例接受PP保存(cDCD-PP)的cDCD供肾受者的临床结局。观察终点包括原发性无功能(PNF)、DGF和急性排斥反应(AR)的发生率、住院时间、1、3、6和12个月时的移植肾功能、移植肾存活和患者存活情况。供者、受者及植入前数据匹配良好。cDCD-PP组的DGF显著更低(53.3%对86.6%,P<0.001),住院时间更短(10天对14天,P<0.033)。同样,cDCD-PP组术后及短期移植肾功能(分别为7天和30天以及6个月和12个月)在统计学上优于cDCD-SCS组。总之,在该队列中,与SCS相比,PP的临床应用与DGF显著降低、住院时间缩短及移植肾功能改善相关。