Leskinen Kaja, Ekman Agneta, Oulis Constantine, Forsberg Hans, Vadiakas George, Larmas Markku
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Cariology and Endodontics, Institute of Dentistry, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2008 Apr;66(2):65-72. doi: 10.1080/00016350801926933.
To evaluate the effectiveness of sealant treatment in preventing dental restorations due to caries in a practice-based research network in Finland, Sweden, and Greece.
Times of tooth emergence, sealing treatment, and dental caries were compiled from the dental charts of 4735 subjects born in 1970-72 in Finland and in 1980-82 in Finland, Sweden, and Greece. Survival time between tooth emergence and placement of first restoration was measured and estimated using survival analysis methodology.
At the end of follow-up (7-10+ years), 30-40% of sealed molars and 60-80% of non-sealed molars were restored. Early sealant placement compared to late sealing did not result in significantly higher survival of 1st molars. The strategy of sealing the 1st molars only in high caries risk subjects was as effective as sealing all the molars and premolars routinely without caries risk determination.
The sealing of all molar fissures proved to be no more effective than sealing risk fissures of subjects. Early sealing did not result in any better outcome than late sealing. The effectiveness of sealant treatment in preventing dental restorations is dependent on the caries risk of individuals and caries prevalence of the country.
在芬兰、瑞典和希腊的一个基于实践的研究网络中,评估窝沟封闭治疗预防龋齿导致的牙齿修复的有效性。
从芬兰4735名1970 - 1972年出生以及芬兰、瑞典和希腊4735名1980 - 1982年出生的受试者的牙科病历中收集牙齿萌出时间、封闭治疗情况和龋齿情况。使用生存分析方法测量和估计牙齿萌出至首次修复之间的生存时间。
在随访结束时(7 - 10 +年),30 - 40%的封闭磨牙和60 - 80%的未封闭磨牙进行了修复。与晚期封闭相比,早期放置窝沟封闭剂并未使第一磨牙的生存率显著提高。仅对高龋齿风险受试者的第一磨牙进行封闭的策略与常规对所有磨牙和前磨牙进行封闭而不进行龋齿风险判定的策略效果相同。
事实证明,封闭所有磨牙裂隙并不比封闭受试者的风险裂隙更有效。早期封闭并不比晚期封闭产生更好的结果。窝沟封闭治疗预防牙齿修复的有效性取决于个体的龋齿风险和国家的龋齿患病率。